IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/akt/journl/v14y2019i3p368-399.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Unequal Development of the Digital Economy in Federal Districts of Russia

Author

Listed:
  • Marina Dubinina

    (Central Economics and Mathematics Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences)

Abstract

Introduction. The article covers the main indicators of the use of information and communication technologies by business, households and the population of the federal districts of the Russian Federation. Methods. The study was carried out by analysis and comparison of statistical information about the use of information and communication technologies in the federal districts of the Russian Federation. The research information base includes the materials of Rosstat, compilations of science statistics and the information society of Rosstat together with the HSE, as well as annual reports of telecommunication companies. Results and Discussion. The authors of the research offered complex indexes of digitalization of federal districts, in terms of the use of information and communication technologies by organizations and the public. Based on these complex indicators, the research divides the federal districts into three groups: with an index value above the average Russian value, close to average value and below the average Russian value. For all three groups the researchers calculated the basic social and economic indicators and demonstrated the relationship between the standard of living of the population of the federal district and its digitalization index. The speed and subscription fee for Internet access relative to the corresponding indicators of Moscow were calculated as a characteristic of the accessibility of information and communication technologies for the population of federal districts. The researchers also analyzed the economic activity of the main companies providing telecommunication services in the federal districts of the Russian Federation. Conclusion. Despite the recent positive trends, there is a large gap between the federal districts in terms of the usage of information and communication technologies. The different level of “digitalization” of federal districts is closely related to the unevenness of their social and economic development. This negatively affects the living conditions of the Russian population, limits the ability of residents of certain regions to find work, get access to on-line education, do business, promote their goods and services. To reduce the backlog of the third group of federal districts, it is recommended to pay special attention to the development of their human capital and increase the availability of information and communication technologies for the population.

Suggested Citation

  • Marina Dubinina, 2019. "Unequal Development of the Digital Economy in Federal Districts of Russia," Science Governance and Scientometrics Journal, Russian Research Institute of Economics, Politics and Law in Science and Technology (RIEPL), vol. 14(3), pages 368-399, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:akt:journl:v:14:y:2019:i:3:p:368-399
    DOI: 10.33873/2686-6706.2019.14-3.368-399
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://en.sie-journal.ru/assets/uploads/issues/2019/3(33)_02.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.33873/2686-6706.2019.14-3.368-399?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lars-Hendrik Roller & Leonard Waverman, 2001. "Telecommunications Infrastructure and Economic Development: A Simultaneous Approach," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 91(4), pages 909-923, September.
    2. Nina Czernich & Oliver Falck & Tobias Kretschmer & Ludger Woessmann, 2011. "Broadband Infrastructure and Economic Growth," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 121(552), pages 505-532, May.
    3. Kevin J. Stiroh & Dale W. Jorgenson, 1999. "Information Technology and Growth," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 89(2), pages 109-115, May.
    4. Maryam Farhadi & Rahmah Ismail & Masood Fooladi, 2012. "Information and Communication Technology Use and Economic Growth," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(11), pages 1-7, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Abdulqadir, Idris A. & Asongu, Simplice A., 2022. "The asymmetric effect of internet access on economic growth in sub-Saharan Africa," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 44-61.
    2. Pradhan, Rudra P. & Arvin, Mak B. & Norman, Neville R., 2015. "The dynamics of information and communications technologies infrastructure, economic growth, and financial development: Evidence from Asian countries," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 135-149.
    3. Elena Toader & Bogdan Narcis Firtescu & Angela Roman & Sorin Gabriel Anton, 2018. "Impact of Information and Communication Technology Infrastructure on Economic Growth: An Empirical Assessment for the EU Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-22, October.
    4. Abdulqadir, Idris & Asongu, Simplice, 2021. "The asymmetric effect of internet access on economic growth in sub-Saharan Africa: Insight from a dynamic panel threshold regression," MPRA Paper 109904, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    5. Arnold, René & Taş, Serpil, 2019. "The value of rich interaction applications for Vietnam: Final report," Study Series, WIK Wissenschaftliches Institut für Infrastruktur und Kommunikationsdienste GmbH, number 251547.
    6. Papaioannou, Sotiris K., 2023. "ICT and economic resilience: Evidence from the COVID-19 pandemic," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    7. Amy Huong Yong Jing & Rossazana Ab-Rahim, 2020. "Information and Communication Technology (ICT) and Economic Growth in ASEAN-5 Countries," Journal of Public Administration and Governance, Macrothink Institute, vol. 10(2), pages 2033-2033, December.
    8. Eleni Laitsou & Antonios Kargas & Dimitrios Varoutas, 2020. "How ICT affects economic growth in the Euro area during the economic crisis," Netnomics, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 59-81, December.
    9. Arnold, René & Hildebrandt, Christian & Tas, Serpil & Kroon, Peter, 2017. "More than Words: A global analysis of the socio-economic impact of Rich Interaction Applications (RIAs)," 28th European Regional ITS Conference, Passau 2017 169445, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
    10. Nadiri, M. Ishaq & Nandi, Banani & Akoz, Kemal Kivanc, 2018. "Impact of modern communication infrastructure on productivity, production structure and factor demands of US industries: Impact revisited," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(6), pages 433-451.
    11. Gómez-Barroso, José Luis & Marbán-Flores, Raquel, 2020. "Telecommunications and economic development – The 21st century: Making the evidence stronger," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(2).
    12. Daniel Ştefan Armeanu & Georgeta Vintilă & Ştefan Cristian Gherghina, 2017. "Empirical Study towards the Drivers of Sustainable Economic Growth in EU-28 Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-22, December.
    13. Ren, Siyu & Hao, Yu & Xu, Lu & Wu, Haitao & Ba, Ning, 2021. "Digitalization and energy: How does internet development affect China's energy consumption?," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    14. Koski, Heli & Kretschmer, Tobias, 2010. "New product development and firm value in mobile handset production," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 22(1), pages 42-50, March.
    15. Vahagn Jerbashian & Anna Kochanova, 2016. "The impact of doing business regulations on investments in ICT," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 50(3), pages 991-1008, May.
    16. Emanuele Giovannetti & Claudio Piga, 2023. "The multifaceted nature of cooperation for innovation, ICT and innovative outcomes: evidence from UK Microdata," Eurasian Business Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 13(3), pages 639-666, September.
    17. Briglauer, Wolfgang & Cambini, Carlo & Melani, Sauro, 2016. "How to Fill the Digital Gap? The (Limited) Role of Regulation," VfS Annual Conference 2016 (Augsburg): Demographic Change 145480, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    18. Jerbashian Vahagn & Kochanova Anna, 2018. "Tele-Communications 2.0: The Age of the Internet," The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 18(3), pages 1-8, July.
    19. Bourreau, Marc & Cambini, Carlo & Doğan, Pınar, 2012. "Access pricing, competition, and incentives to migrate from “old” to “new” technology," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 30(6), pages 713-723.
    20. Stockinger, Bastian, 2017. "The effect of broadband internet on establishments' employment growth: evidence from Germany," IAB-Discussion Paper 201719, Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), Nürnberg [Institute for Employment Research, Nuremberg, Germany].

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:akt:journl:v:14:y:2019:i:3:p:368-399. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lubov Pudovkina (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://riep.ru/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.