Managing knowledge sharing — Case study of a consulting firm
AbstractThis paper examines how existing patterns in knowledge sharing within a business organization can be managed to promote knowledge sharing. The existing patterns are analyzed in a Dutch consulting company using the four elementary forms of sociality (communal sharing, authority ranking, equality matching, and market pricing) as defined by the Relational Models Theory (Fiske 1991). The results support the hypothesis that the four models of Fiske’s theory can describe all knowledge sharing inside this consulting firm. The research introduced the so-called knowledge sharing patterns, which are combinations of the four models, as extensions of the original theory. Once management better understood the patterns in the organization, they could initiate changes which led to higher level of knowledge sharing. The changes included more formal and informal meetings, organization of communities of practice, and new use of the intranet portal. This shows that the extension of Fiske’s theory, beyond its contribution to science, can be the basis for a useful methodology to deliver business value.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Bibliographic InfoArticle provided by Akadémiai Kiadó, Hungary in its journal Society and Economy.
Volume (Year): 34 (2012)
Issue (Month): 1 (April)
Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://www.akkrt.hu
Postal: Akadémiai Kiadó Zrt., Prielle K. u. 21-35. Budapest, 1117, Hungary
Find related papers by JEL classification:
- M52 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting - - Personnel Economics - - - Compensation and Compensation Methods and Their Effects
- M12 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting - - Business Administration - - - Personnel Management; Executives; Executive Compensation
- M10 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting - - Business Administration - - - General
You can help add them by filling out this form.
reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.Access and download statisticsgeneral information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Andrea Pók) The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Andrea Pók to update the entry or send us the correct address.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.