IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/jlofdr/26768.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Profile of Farmers' Market Consumers and the Perceived Advantages of Produce Sold at Farmers' Markets

Author

Listed:
  • Wolf, Marianne McGarry
  • Spittler, Arianne
  • Ahern, James

Abstract

This study examines responses of 336 produce consumers in San Luis Obispo County, California, to compare the profile of farmers' market shoppers to those who do not shop at farmers' markets. The characteristics of produce sold in farmers' markets are compared to those sold at supermarkets to determine why consumers shop in farmers' markets. This examination of the demographic profile of farmers' market produce consumers indicates that they are more likely to be female, married, and have completed post graduate work. The age levels, income levels, and employment status are similar between farmers' market shoppers and farmers' market non-shoppers. Farmers' market shoppers indicate that cooking and family meals are important to them. Consumers indicate that quality and value are among the most important attributes when purchasing produce. Consumers perceive that farmers' market produce is fresher looking, fresher tasting, a higher-quality product, a better value for the money, more reasonably priced, more likely to be grown in their country, more likely to be locally grown, more likely to be good for the environment, and more likely to be traceable to the processor and grower when compared to supermarket produce. However, many consumers do not shop at farmers' markets due to a lack of convenience.

Suggested Citation

  • Wolf, Marianne McGarry & Spittler, Arianne & Ahern, James, 2005. "A Profile of Farmers' Market Consumers and the Perceived Advantages of Produce Sold at Farmers' Markets," Journal of Food Distribution Research, Food Distribution Research Society, vol. 36(1), pages 1-10, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:jlofdr:26768
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.26768
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/26768/files/36010192.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.26768?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wolf, Marianne McGarry & Berrenson, Eric, 2003. "A Comparison Of Purchasing Behaviors And Consumer Profiles At San Luis Obispo'S Thursday Night Farmers' Market: A Case Study," Journal of Food Distribution Research, Food Distribution Research Society, vol. 34(1), pages 1-16, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Detre, Joshua D. & Mark, Tyler B. & Clark, Benjamin M., 2010. "Understanding Why College-Educated Millennials Shop at Farmers Markets: An Analysis of Students at Louisiana State University," Journal of Food Distribution Research, Food Distribution Research Society, vol. 41(3), pages 1-11, November.
    2. Stewart, Hayden & Dong, Diansheng, 2018. "How strong is the demand for food through direct-to-consumer outlets?," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 35-43.
    3. Kyung-Hee Kim & Duk-Byeong Park, 2014. "Factors Influencing Rural Tourists' Purchasing Behaviour: Four Types of Direct Farm Markets in South Korea," Tourism Economics, , vol. 20(3), pages 629-645, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Consumer/Household Economics;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:jlofdr:26768. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fdrssea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.