IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/jlaare/31199.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Market And Welfare Effects Of Livestock Feed Subsidies In Southeastern New Mexico

Author

Listed:
  • Skaggs, Rhonda K.
  • Falk, Constance L.

Abstract

Input subsidies have the potential to increase production, promote more input use, and impact the environment. Unlike many other federal agricultural subsidies, livestock feed programs have not been the subject of previous economic research. During 1992-96, the U.S. Department of Agriculture paid livestock producers an annual average of $73.2 million in feed subsidies. The objective of this research is to estimate the market and welfare effects of feed subsidies in one region of New Mexico. The price and output effects of the subsidy are found to be small, and the welfare impacts of the subsidy unevenly distributed between subsidized and nonsubsidized producers.

Suggested Citation

  • Skaggs, Rhonda K. & Falk, Constance L., 1998. "Market And Welfare Effects Of Livestock Feed Subsidies In Southeastern New Mexico," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 23(2), pages 1-13, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:jlaare:31199
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.31199
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/31199/files/23020545.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.31199?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Arthur H. Smith & William E. Martin, 1972. "Socioeconomic Behavior of Cattle Ranchers, with Implications for Rural Community Development in the West," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 54(2), pages 217-225.
    2. Eric D. Ebel & Robert H. Hornbaker & Carl H. Nelson, 1992. "Welfare Effects of the National Pseudorabies Eradication Program," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 74(3), pages 638-645.
    3. William E. Foster & Linda S. Calvin & Grace M. Johns & Patricia Rottschaefer, 1986. "Distributional Welfare Implications of an Irrigation Water Subsidy," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 68(4), pages 778-786.
    4. Rajan K. Sampath, 1983. "Returns to Public Irrigation Development," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 65(2), pages 337-339.
    5. Erik Lichtenberg & Douglas D. Parker & David Zilberman, 1988. "Marginal Analysis of Welfare Costs of Environmental Policies: The Case of Pesticide Regulation," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 70(4), pages 867-874.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Timothy A. Wise, "undated". "Identifying the Real Winners from U.S. Agricultural Policies," GDAE Working Papers 05-07, GDAE, Tufts University.
    2. Elanor Starmer & Aimee Witteman & Timothy A. Wise, "undated". "Feeding the Factory Farm: Implicit Subsidies to the Broiler Chicken Industry," GDAE Working Papers 06-03, GDAE, Tufts University.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Skaggs, Rhonda K. & Falk, Constance L., 1997. "Market and Welfare Effects of Livestock Feed Subsidies," 1997 Annual Meeting, July 13-16, 1997, Reno\ Sparks, Nevada 35944, Western Agricultural Economics Association.
    2. Lichtenberg, Erik, 2002. "Agriculture and the environment," Handbook of Agricultural Economics, in: B. L. Gardner & G. C. Rausser (ed.), Handbook of Agricultural Economics, edition 1, volume 2, chapter 23, pages 1249-1313, Elsevier.
    3. Wasantha Athukorala & Clevo Wilson, 2017. "Distributional impacts of irrigation-induced agricultural development in a semi-subsistence economy: new evidence," Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, Springer;Society for Environmental Economics and Policy Studies - SEEPS, vol. 19(1), pages 59-75, January.
    4. Alyson S Barratt & Matthieu H Arnoult & Bouda Vosough Ahmadi & Karl M Rich & George J Gunn & Alistair W Stott, 2018. "A framework for estimating society's economic welfare following the introduction of an animal disease: The case of Johne's disease," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(6), pages 1-26, June.
    5. Lichtenberg, Erik & Zilberman, David & Archibald, Sandra O., 1990. "Economics and Pesticides," Working Papers 197750, University of Maryland, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    6. Phillips, Mark & Hueth, Darrell L. & Just, Richard E., 1989. "Estimating Cost of Banning Agricultural Chemicals: The Case of Maneb and Maneb Alternatives," Working Papers 197631, University of Maryland, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    7. Budi P. Resosudarmo, 2001. "Impact of the Integrated Pest Management Program on the Indonesian Economy," EEPSEA Research Report rr2001101, Economy and Environment Program for Southeast Asia (EEPSEA), revised Oct 2001.
    8. Zilberman, David, 1989. "The Appropriate Model For The Choice Of Agricultural Inputs: Primal, Dual, Or Other," 1989 Annual Meeting, July 30-August 2, Baton Rouge, Louisiana 270493, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    9. Parker, Douglas D. & Zilberman, David, 1994. "The Distributional Effects Of Private Sector R&D Management: In-House And At Public Institutions," 1994 Annual Meeting, August 7-10, San Diego, California 271415, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    10. de Fraiture, Charlotte & Perry, C. J., 2007. "Why is agricultural water demand unresponsive at low price ranges?," IWMI Books, Reports H040602, International Water Management Institute.
    11. Tanaka, John A. & Torell, L. Allen & Rimbey, Neil R., 2005. "Who Are Public Land Ranchers and Why Are They Out There?," Western Economics Forum, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 4(2), pages 1-7.
    12. David Zilberman & Amir Heiman, 1997. "The Value of Economic Research," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 79(5), pages 1539-1544.
    13. Blackburn, Donald J. & Brinkman, George L. & Driver, Herbert C. & Wilson, Trevor D., 1979. "A Comparison of Behavioral and Economic Characteristics of Selected Commercial and Limited Resource Farmers," Working Papers 244840, University of Guelph, Department of Food, Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    14. Martin, William E. & Seitz, Wesley D., 1991. "The Search for an Optimal U.S. Agricultural Water Quality Policy," 1991 Annual Meeting, August 4-7, Manhattan, Kansas 271213, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    15. Hall, David C. & Kaiser, Harry M. & Blake, Robert W., 1998. "Modelling the economics of animal health control programs using dynamic programming," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 56(1), pages 125-144, January.
    16. Badulescu, Dan & Baylis, Katherine R., 2006. "Pesticide Regulation Under NAFTA: Harmonization in Process?," Commissioned Papers 24163, Canadian Agricultural Trade Policy Research Network.
    17. Martin, William E. & Tinney, J. Craig & Gum, Russell L., 1978. "Comparing Estimates of Market and Nonmarket Values for Products of a Given Land Base," Economics Statistics and Cooperative Services (ESCS) Reports 329532, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    18. Powers, Nicholas J. & Heifner, Richard G., 1993. "Federal Grade Standards for Fresh Produce: Linkages to Pesticide Use," Agricultural Information Bulletins 309690, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    19. Cox, Craig A. & Easter, K. William, 1990. "A Regional Ban Of Alachlor And Atrazine In Southeastern Minnesota: The Economic And Environmental Effects," Staff Papers 13945, University of Minnesota, Department of Applied Economics.
    20. Letson, David & Setia, Parveen P., 1994. "On-Farm Costos of Reducing environmental degradation under risk," Estudios Económicos, El Colegio de México, Centro de Estudios Económicos, vol. 9(2), pages 163-187.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agricultural and Food Policy;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:jlaare:31199. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/waeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.