IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/aolpei/320240.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Animal Husbandry Export Measures Productivity: What is the Position of the Czech Republic?

Author

Listed:
  • Rumánková, Lenka
  • Kuzmenko, Elena
  • Benešová, Irena
  • Smutka, Luboš
  • Laputková, Adriana

Abstract

Efficiency, productivity and competitiveness are important indicators of any production process. Speaking of agriculture and, in particular, animal husbandry in the light of sustainable development context, the values of these indicators become of special importance. Since adequate and efficient usage of disposable labour, land and capital can play a crucial role in obtaining and preserving higher efficiency and productivity levels, the natural question arises - does any relationship exist between mentioned production factors and revealed comparative advantage? The main aim of this research is to evaluate the relationship between export-measured productivity and comparative advantages in animal husbandry of selected European countries. The benchmark is provided in relation to the Czech Republic. To analyse productivity of agricultural and, more specifically, animal production in the European countries selected for the analysis (based on available balanced data incorporating the period from 2005 to 2017), a decision was made to trace export performance of these countries recalculated with regard to a unit of core productive factors, such as land, labour and capital. Based on the foreign trade indicators (Gruber Lloyd index, RCA index), cluster analysis was conducted, in which individual calculation was used as an input variable. Subsequently, hierarchical clustering and Ward ́s method were used. The evidence from this study suggests that the revealed comparative advantage of the countries is not determined primarily by the level of export-based productivity. The relationship between these variables is rather weak and very often negative, which indicates that productivity indicators do not play a significant role in the overall competitiveness of the monitored countries.

Suggested Citation

  • Rumánková, Lenka & Kuzmenko, Elena & Benešová, Irena & Smutka, Luboš & Laputková, Adriana, 2020. "Animal Husbandry Export Measures Productivity: What is the Position of the Czech Republic?," AGRIS on-line Papers in Economics and Informatics, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Faculty of Economics and Management, vol. 12(4), December.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:aolpei:320240
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.320240
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/320240/files/Animal%20Husbandry%20Export%20Measures%20Productivity%3A%20What%20is%20the%20Position%20of%20the%20Czech%20Republic%3F.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.320240?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Štefan Bojnec & Imre Fertő, 2015. "Agri-Food Export Competitiveness in European Union Countries," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(3), pages 476-492, May.
    2. Sohrab Abizadeh & Manish Pandey, 2009. "Trade Openness, Structural Change and Total Factor Productivity," International Economic Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(4), pages 545-559.
    3. Channing Arndt & Simon J. Roberts, 2018. "Key issues in regional growth and integration in Southern Africa," Development Southern Africa, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(3), pages 297-314, May.
    4. Karl Aiginger, 2000. "Specialisation of European Manufacturing," Austrian Economic Quarterly, WIFO, vol. 5(2), pages 81-92, May.
    5. Adriaen, D. & Kleynhans, Theo E. & Tollens, Eric, 2004. "A comparison between South African agricultural exports to the European union and those of other selected southern hemisphere countries," Agrekon, Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa (AEASA), vol. 43(2), pages 1-18, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Baráth, Lajos & Fertő, Imre, 2020. "Accounting for TFP Growth in Global Agriculture - a Common-Factor- Approach-Based TFP Estimation," AGRIS on-line Papers in Economics and Informatics, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Faculty of Economics and Management, vol. 12(4), December.
    2. Kavčáková, Michaela & Kočišová, Kristína, 2020. "Using Data Envelopment Analysis in Credit Risk Evaluation of ICT Companies," AGRIS on-line Papers in Economics and Informatics, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Faculty of Economics and Management, vol. 12(4), December.
    3. Slaboch, Josef & Čechura, Lukáš, 2020. "Land Pricing Model: Price Re-evaluation Due to the Erosion and Climate Change Effects," AGRIS on-line Papers in Economics and Informatics, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Faculty of Economics and Management, vol. 12(4), December.
    4. Montañana, José Miguel & Marangio, Paolo & Hervás, Antonio, 2020. "Open Source Framework for Enabling HPC and Cloud Geoprocessing Services," AGRIS on-line Papers in Economics and Informatics, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Faculty of Economics and Management, vol. 12(4), December.
    5. Zdráhal, Ivo & Verter, Nahanga & Lategan, Francois, 2020. "‘Products Mapping’ of South Africa’s Agri-food trade with the EU28 and Africa," AGRIS on-line Papers in Economics and Informatics, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Faculty of Economics and Management, vol. 12(4), December.
    6. Vasylieva, Natalia, 2020. "Application of Markowitz Portfolio Theory to Producing the World Major Field Crops," AGRIS on-line Papers in Economics and Informatics, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Faculty of Economics and Management, vol. 12(4), December.
    7. Zdráhal, Ivo & Verter, Nahanga & Lategan, Francois, 2020. "‘Products Mapping’ of South Africa’s Agri-food trade with the EU28 and Africa," AGRIS on-line Papers in Economics and Informatics, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Faculty of Economics and Management, vol. 10(3), December.
    8. Ibrahim, Muazu, 2020. "Effects of trade and financial integration on structural transformation in Africa: New evidence from a sample splitting approach," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 556(C).
    9. Maria Tsiapa, 2014. "Industrial Concentration Patterns of the European Union," SCIENZE REGIONALI, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2014(3), pages 5-33.
    10. Fertö, I., 2018. "Global Agri-food Trade Competitiveness: Gross Versus Value Added Exports," AGRIS on-line Papers in Economics and Informatics, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Faculty of Economics and Management, vol. 10(4), December.
    11. Tamás Mizik, 2021. "Agri-Food Trade Competitiveness: A Review of the Literature," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-14, October.
    12. Jámbor, Attila & Tóth, Andrea Tímea & Kőröshegyi, Domonkos, 2017. "Az agrárexport versenyképessége - a nemzetközi fűszer-kereskedelem esete [Export competitiveness in agriculture: the case of the international spice trade]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(11), pages 1202-1223.
    13. Farid MAKHLOUF & Natalia VECHIU, 2010. "Economic Integration and Productive Specialization in the EU27: does FDI influence Countries’ Specialization?," Working Papers 2010-2011_6, CATT - UPPA - Université de Pau et des Pays de l'Adour, revised Nov 2010.
    14. Beňuš Ondrej, 2019. "Competitiveness of the Czech Meat Industry on the Single Market," European Countryside, Sciendo, vol. 11(3), pages 443-461, September.
    15. Ali, Amjad, 2022. "Financial Liberalization, Institutional Quality and Economic Growth Nexus: Panel Analysis of African Countries," MPRA Paper 116101, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    16. Oana Ancuta Stangaciu, 2011. "The Dynamic Of Regional Trade Specialisation Pattern In Romania," CES Working Papers, Centre for European Studies, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, vol. 3(2), pages 336-354, June.
    17. Brinca, Pedro, 2014. "Distortions in the neoclassical growth model: A cross-country analysis," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 1-19.
    18. Channing Arndt, 2018. "New Data, New Approaches and New Evidence: A Policy Synthesis," South African Journal of Economics, Economic Society of South Africa, vol. 86(S1), pages 167-178, January.
    19. Tracy Ledger, 2019. "Charity begins at home: The political economy of non-tariff barriers to trade in Southern Africa," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2019-61, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    20. Sandy Lowitt, 2019. "Black cat, white cat: Lessons to be learned from ASEAN," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2019-26, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aolpei:320240. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fevszcz.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.