IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/aolpei/241375.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Do Digital Public Services Matter? A Comparative Study of the Czech Republic and the Republic of Kazakhstan

Author

Listed:
  • Ulman, Miloš
  • Ualiyev, N. S.
  • Toregozhina, M. B.

Abstract

Provision of quality public services has been in great concern of many governments for longer period of time. An interesting fact could be observed that, as to the demand and supply of digital public services, some developed European countries could lag behind some upper-middle-income countries. The paper explores differences in digital public services provision (supply side) and use (demand side) between the Czech Republic and Kazakhstan. A document analysis was done and a comparative study based on secondary data was elaborated. We can confirm that even a country from outside of the EU (Kazakhstan) can provide a better organized supply of digital services than an EU member state (Czech Republic) at least on the national level. According to the Digital Economy and Society Index (DESI) benchmarking, there are also significant discrepancies among national, regional and local services in the EU. The same phenomenon is also reported from transitional countries like Kazakhstan.

Suggested Citation

  • Ulman, Miloš & Ualiyev, N. S. & Toregozhina, M. B., 2016. "Do Digital Public Services Matter? A Comparative Study of the Czech Republic and the Republic of Kazakhstan," AGRIS on-line Papers in Economics and Informatics, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Faculty of Economics and Management, vol. 8(2), pages 1-13, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:aolpei:241375
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.241375
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/241375/files/agris_on-line_2016_2_ulman_ualiyev_toregozhina.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.241375?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Leanne Townsend & Arjuna Sathiaseelan & Gorry Fairhurst & Claire Wallace, 2013. "Enhanced broadband access as a solution to the social and economic problems of the rural digital divide," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 28(6), pages 580-595, September.
    2. Shahjahan Bhuiyan, 2010. "E-Government in Kazakhstan: Challenges and Its Role to Development," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 10(1), pages 31-47, March.
    3. Khalil Moghaddam, B. & Khatoon-Abadi, A., 2013. "Factors affecting ICT adoption among rural users: A case study of ICT Center in Iran," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(11), pages 1083-1094.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xia, Jun, 2022. "Juggling ecumenical wisdoms and xenophobic institutions: Framing and modelling China's telecommunications universal service and rural digitalization initiatives and policies," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(2).
    2. Shagufta Aman, 2022. "Transforming Public Sector Through e-Governance: A Case Study of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (Article)," The Pakistan Development Review, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, vol. 61(3), pages 365-398.
    3. Peerayuth Charoensukmongkol & Murad Moqbel, 2014. "Does Investment in ICT Curb or Create More Corruption? A Cross-Country Analysis," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 14(1), pages 51-63, March.
    4. Lelie, T. & Sadowski, B. & Brennenreadts, R. & Smits, J., 2017. "Government involvement and learning in business model experimentation: NGA deployment in rural areas in the Netherlands," 28th European Regional ITS Conference, Passau 2017 169479, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
    5. Jaume Benseny & Juuso Toyli & Heikki Hammainen & Andr'es Arcia-Moret, 2019. "The mitigating role of regulation on the concentric patterns of broadband diffusion. The case of Finland," Papers 1905.03002, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2020.
    6. Correa, Teresa & Pavez, Isabel & Contreras, Javier, 2017. "Beyond access: A relational and resource-based model of household Internet adoption in isolated communities," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(9), pages 757-768.
    7. Torabi, Zabih-Allah & Rezvani, Mohammad Reza & Hall, C. Michael & Allam, Zaheer, 2023. "On the post-pandemic travel boom: How capacity building and smart tourism technologies in rural areas can help - evidence from Iran," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    8. Chiha, Asma & Van der Wee, Marlies & Colle, Didier & Verbrugge, Sofie, 2020. "Techno-economic viability of integrating satellite communication in 4G networks to bridge the broadband digital divide," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(3).
    9. Nadeem Ul Haque & Faheem Jehangir Khan (ed.), 2022. "RASTA Local Research, Local Solutions: Technology & Public Service Delivery, Volume III," PIDE Books, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, number 2022:9, December.
    10. Fan, Qingji & Kuper, Paul & Choi, Yun Hyeong & Choi, Seong-jin, 2021. "Does ICT development curb firms’ perceived corruption pressure? The contingent impact of institutional qualities and competitive conditions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 496-507.
    11. Willison Doma Ntemi & Ulingeta Obadia Mbamba, 2016. "The relationship between electronic readiness and corruption reduction: Countrywide data analysis," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 3(1), pages 1257555-125, December.
    12. Kenichiro Onitsuka, 2019. "How Social Media Can Foster Social Innovation in Disadvantaged Rural Communities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-24, May.
    13. Ovando, Catalina & Olivera, Emmanuel, 2018. "Was household internet adoption driven by the reform? Evaluation of the 2013 telecommunication reform in Mexico," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(9), pages 700-714.
    14. Xia, Jun, 2018. "The Chinese model of universal service policy: A two-decade retrospect based on an integrated framework," 22nd ITS Biennial Conference, Seoul 2018. Beyond the boundaries: Challenges for business, policy and society 190374, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
    15. Navío-Marco, Julio & Pérez-Leal, Raquel & Ruiz-Gómez, Luis Manuel, 2019. "Analysis of the WiFi4EU initiative as a potential instrument to correct digital divide in rural areas in the EU," 30th European Regional ITS Conference, Helsinki 2019 205200, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
    16. Animesh Agrawal & Chitranjan Kumar & Suraj Kumar Mukti, 2021. "Role of Information and Communication Technology (ICT) to Enhance the Success of Knowledge Management (KM): a Study in a Steel Plant," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 12(4), pages 1760-1786, December.
    17. Salemink, Koen & Strijker, Dirk, 2018. "The participation society and its inability to correct the failure of market players to deliver adequate service levels in rural areas," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(9), pages 757-765.
    18. Abdulai Adams & Rose Omari & Karbo Ransford Teng-Viel, 2020. "Smartphone Usage in the Greater Accra Region of Ghana: What are the Critical Drivers?," International Journal of Asian Social Science, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 10(2), pages 129-141, February.
    19. Gupta, Ruchita & Jain, Karuna, 2015. "Adoption behavior of rural India for mobile telephony: A multigroup study," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(8), pages 691-704.
    20. Muhammad Tariq Majeed, 2020. "Do digital governments foster economic growth in the developing world? An empirical analysis," Netnomics, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 1-16, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aolpei:241375. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fevszcz.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.