IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aes/amfeco/v23y2021i58p864.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Crisis After the Crisis – Resilience or Reset?

Author

Listed:
  • Valeriu Ioan-Franc

    (Romanian Academy, The National Institute of Economic Research “Costin C. Kiritescu”, Bucharest, Romania)

  • Andrei-Marius Diamescu

    (Romanian Academy, The National Institute of Economic Research “Costin C. Kiritescu”, Bucharest, Romania)

Abstract

The concept of “the crisis after the crisis” recently introduced in the academic debate refers to the fact that, since the outbreak of the health crisis generated by SARS-CoV-2, the pandemic has had a major impact on all economic, social, political and cultural activities of the daily life, influencing significantly the global development. However, the sanitary crisis has induced a multiple faceted crisis, with a number of implications whose consequences are to impact on the further development of the human society as a whole. Treated at first with a certain degree of “relaxation”, considering the stage we were facing at the time, when both the scientific community and the decision-making actors of the responsible organizations in the field were focusing on the management of the situation, unprecedented at such a scale, on identifying the protocols and action strategies, respectively on implementing recommendations for governments, companies and population, “the crisis after the crisis” would really capture the researchers’ attention in the second part of the last year. On the occasion of the Penser l'Europe International Academic Seminar of the Romanian Academy in October 2020, the phrase was retained internationally by two famous economists, honorary members of the Romanian Academy: Jaime Gil Aluja, the president of the Spanish Royal Academy of Economic and Financial Sciences, and Thierry de Montbrial, member of the French Academy of Moral and Political Sciences. The debate that took place on this occasion, obviously “energized” by the already visible social, cultural, economic and sanitary effects, as well as the major impact of the pandemic over the national and international macroeconomic indicators, extended significantly the field of thought regarding the “cascading” consequences both of the infections and of the measures to limit and especially to combat the spread of the virus, justifying once more the necessity to quickly identify globally viable solutions adjusted to each national economic and epidemiological bivectorial context to facilitate the return to a normal life as soon as possible.

Suggested Citation

  • Valeriu Ioan-Franc & Andrei-Marius Diamescu, 2021. "The Crisis After the Crisis – Resilience or Reset?," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 23(58), pages 864-864, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:aes:amfeco:v:23:y:2021:i:58:p:864
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.amfiteatrueconomic.ro/temp/Article_3038.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Andrew R. Thomas & Nicolae Al. Pop & Constantin Bratianu (ed.), 2013. "The Changing Business Landscape of Romania," Springer Books, Springer, edition 127, number 978-1-4614-6865-3, November.
    2. Iulia Diana Popa & Dan-Cristian Dabija, 2019. "Developing the Romanian Organic Market: A Producer’s Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-15, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. DRAGOMIR Camelia-Cristina & ZAMFIRACHE Alexandra & ALBU Ruxandra-Gabriela & FORIS Tiberiu, 2023. "Implications Of Crises On Start-Up Management And Ways To Increase Business Resilience And Sustainable Development," Studies in Business and Economics, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 18(3), pages 118-135, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anna Justyna Parzonko & Agata Balińska & Anna Sieczko, 2021. "Pro-Environmental Behaviors of Generation Z in the Context of the Concept of Homo Socio-Oeconomicus," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-18, March.
    2. Dan-Cristian Dabija & Brândușa Mariana Bejan & Claudiu Pușcaș, 2020. "A Qualitative Approach to the Sustainable Orientation of Generation Z in Retail: The Case of Romania," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-20, July.
    3. Mihai Andronie & George Lăzăroiu & Roxana Ștefănescu & Cristian Uță & Irina Dijmărescu, 2021. "Sustainable, Smart, and Sensing Technologies for Cyber-Physical Manufacturing Systems: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-23, May.
    4. Mihai Stoica, 2021. "Green Marketing Communication Strategies: An Integrative Literature Review," Annals of Faculty of Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 1(1), pages 388-396, July.
    5. repec:aud:audfin:v:21:y:2019:i:50:p:258 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Michalak Szymon & Ankiel Magdalena & Olejniczak Tomasz & Stachowiak-Krzyżan Magda & Bartkowiak Paweł, 2022. "Motives for the Usage of Collaborative Fashion Consumption Online Platforms," Marketing of Scientific and Research Organizations, Sciendo, vol. 44(2), pages 41-66, June.
    7. Kinga Nagy-Pércsi & Csaba Fogarassy, 2019. "Important Influencing and Decision Factors in Organic Food Purchasing in Hungary," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-21, November.
    8. Marra, Alessandro & Antonelli, Paola & Dell’Anna, Luca & Pozzi, Cesare, 2015. "A network analysis using metadata to investigate innovation in clean-tech – Implications for energy policy," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 17-26.
    9. Vlad Roșca, 2014. "Web interfaces for e‐CRM in sports: Evidence from Romanian Football," Management & Marketing, Economic Publishing House, vol. 9(1), Spring.
    10. Ruxandra BEJINARU, 2016. "Knowledge Dynamics Impact on Intellectual Capital in Organizations," Management Dynamics in the Knowledge Economy, College of Management, National University of Political Studies and Public Administration, vol. 4(4), pages 515-534, December.
    11. Romana Emilia Cramarenco & Monica Ioana Burca-Voicu & Dan-Cristian Dabija, 2023. "Organic Food Consumption During the COVID-19 Pandemic. A Bibliometric Analysis and Systematic Review," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 25(S17), pages 1042-1042, November.
    12. Julia Wojciechowska-Solis & Anetta Barska, 2021. "Exploring the Preferences of Consumers’ Organic Products in Aspects of Sustainable Consumption: The Case of the Polish Consumer," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-17, February.
    13. Daniel Adrian Gardan & Ionel Dumitru & Iuliana Petronela Gardan & Irina Elena Andronie & Cristian Uta & Mihai Andronie, 2019. "Integrating the Principles of Green Marketing by Using Big Data. Good Practices," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 21(50), pages 258-258, February.
    14. Iulia Diana Popa & Dan-Cristian Dabija, 2019. "Developing the Romanian Organic Market: A Producer’s Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-15, January.
    15. Andreas Aigner & Robert Wilken & Sylvie Geisendorf, 2019. "The Effectiveness of Promotional Cues for Organic Products in the German Retail Market," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-15, December.
    16. Alawiya Allui & Luisa Pinto, 2022. "Non-Financial Benefits of Corporate Social Responsibility to Saudi Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-16, March.
    17. Nicolae Al. Pop & Dan-Cristian Dabija & Ana Maria Iorga, 2014. "Ethical Responsibility of Neuromarketing Companies in Harnessing the Market Research – a Global Exploratory Approach," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 16(35), pages 1-26, February.
    18. Cristina Fleșeriu & Smaranda Adina Cosma & Vlad Bocăneț, 2020. "Values and Planned Behaviour of the Romanian Organic Food Consumer," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-21, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    economic crisis; pandemic crisis; the economy of Romania; economic development; economic resilience; economic reset; “the crisis after the crisis”; National Recovery and Resilience Plan.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • F63 - International Economics - - Economic Impacts of Globalization - - - Economic Development
    • G01 - Financial Economics - - General - - - Financial Crises
    • H1 - Public Economics - - Structure and Scope of Government
    • H2 - Public Economics - - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue
    • O1 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aes:amfeco:v:23:y:2021:i:58:p:864. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Valentin Dumitru (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aseeero.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.