IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aes/amfeco/v21y2019i51p347.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploring the Role of Individual Food Security in the Assessment of Population’s Food Safety

Author

Listed:
  • Magdalena Bobe

    (The Bucharest University of Economic Studies)

  • Roxana Procopie

    (The Bucharest University of Economic Studies)

  • Mihaela Bucur

    (The Bucharest University of Economic Studies)

Abstract

Ensuring a sufficient level of food for the population in both quantitative and qualitative terms is a priority for most countries as well as for governmental and non-governmental bodies – be they national, regional or international. The United Nations (UN) stresses the fact that one of the biggest problems the world is facing today is food insecurity. Most people enjoy food security, but the reverse is an unquestionable daily reality for nearly a billion people around the world. The concept of food security has had different meanings at different times, the definition changing over the years but the fundamental concept behind it remaining the same. When defining food security, we have to adopt a comprehensive approach, taking into account the economical, political, social and cultural factors that shape it, as well as find practical solutions to ensure its continued existence. Thus, resolving the food problem and ensuring food security must start from studying the relationship between consumption needs and the available food resources, rely on anthropometric research methods, and target population segments according to their biological needs. Starting from the study of the conceptual framework offered by the specialized literature, the present paper aims to clarify and identify the aspects which lie at the basis of studying the food security / insecurity for a population, through exploratory research. The exploratory research of an individual’s food and nutritional security allows for a profound understanding of the concept, the factors that affect it and the interdependence between them, it also ensures a qualitative information gathering process. The results of the study may develop into measures aimed at improving individual food security as part of national food security. This research is done through the method of survey among the students of the Faculty of Business and Tourism, part of the Academy of Economic Studies. The statistical tool used was a questionnaire to identify the nutritional status of the respondents, but also their eating habits. Starting from the necessity of correcting imbalances in the behaviour related to food consumption, our scientific approach can be used to establish solutions for improving food consumption at the individual level, as a dimension of food security, for a segment of the population in Romania.

Suggested Citation

  • Magdalena Bobe & Roxana Procopie & Mihaela Bucur, 2019. "Exploring the Role of Individual Food Security in the Assessment of Population’s Food Safety," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 21(51), pages 347-347.
  • Handle: RePEc:aes:amfeco:v:21:y:2019:i:51:p:347
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.amfiteatrueconomic.ro/temp/Article_2817.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Elena Briones Alonso & Lara Cockx & Jo Swinnen, 2017. "Culture and food security," Working Papers of Department of Economics, Leuven 591898, KU Leuven, Faculty of Economics and Business (FEB), Department of Economics, Leuven.
    2. Ramona Lile & Claudia Boghicevici & Camelia Daciana Stoian, 2018. "Role of social professions in the process of sustainable development of rural area. Study case," Juridical Tribune (Tribuna Juridica), Bucharest Academy of Economic Studies, Law Department, vol. 8(2), pages 415-424, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lelia Voinea & Dorin Vicentiu Popescu & Teodor Mihai Negrea & Razvan Dina, 2024. "Cultured Meat – From Scientific Challenge to Consumer Acceptance as Sustainable Food Source," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 26(65), pages 346-346, February.
    2. Lelia Voinea & Dorin Vicențiu Popescu & Mihaela Bucur & Teodor Mihai Negrea & Răzvan Dina & Calcedonia Enache, 2020. "Reshaping the Traditional Pattern of Food Consumption in Romania through the Integration of Sustainable Diet Principles. A Qualitative Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-25, July.
    3. Zhanar Ordabekovna Tokhayeva & Botagoz Zhenisovna Almukhambetova & Bektur Keneshbayev & Kamshat Akhmetova, 2020. "Innovative processes' management in agriculture and food security: development opportunities," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 7(3), pages 1565-1579, March.
    4. Lelia Voinea & Diana Maria Vrânceanu & Alina Filip & Dorin Vicențiu Popescu & Teodor Mihai Negrea & Răzvan Dina, 2019. "Research on Food Behavior in Romania from the Perspective of Supporting Healthy Eating Habits," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-26, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. repec:aud:audfin:v:21:y:2019:i:51:p:347 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Tiberiu Iancu & Ionuț Laurențiu Petre & Valentina Constanta Tudor & Marius Mihai Micu & Ana Ursu & Florina-Ruxandra Teodorescu & Eduard Alexandru Dumitru, 2022. "A Difficult Pattern to Change in Romania, the Perspective of Socio-Economic Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-29, February.
    3. Soo Jin Park & Heather Yeatman & Joanna Russell & Catherine MacPhail, 2022. "Barriers to Urban Food Action: Relevance of Food Pedagogies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-17, January.
    4. Ameye, H., 2018. "Secondary Towns The Nutritional Sweet Spot. A study of East Africa," 2018 Conference, July 28-August 2, 2018, Vancouver, British Columbia 277211, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    5. Bojan Matkovski & Danilo Đokić & Stanislav Zekić & Žana Jurjević, 2020. "Determining Food Security in Crisis Conditions: A Comparative Analysis of the Western Balkans and the EU," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-16, November.
    6. Zhanar Ordabekovna Tokhayeva & Botagoz Zhenisovna Almukhambetova & Bektur Keneshbayev & Kamshat Akhmetova, 2020. "Innovative processes' management in agriculture and food security: development opportunities," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 7(3), pages 1565-1579, March.
    7. Oscar Ingasia Ayuya & Katrine Soma & Benson Obwanga, 2021. "Socio-Economic Drivers of Fish Species Consumption Preferences in Kenya’s Urban Informal Food System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-15, May.
    8. Li Gao & Yingdan Mei & Xiaohan Yang & Congyu Zhao & Daimeng Li, 2021. "Vanity and food waste: Empirical evidence from China," Journal of Consumer Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 55(4), pages 1211-1225, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    individual food security; food and nutritional insecurity; nutritional status; nutrition; nutrition education; population.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • I12 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Health Behavior
    • L66 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Manufacturing - - - Food; Beverages; Cosmetics; Tobacco
    • Q18 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Agricultural Policy; Food Policy; Animal Welfare Policy
    • P46 - Political Economy and Comparative Economic Systems - - Other Economic Systems - - - Consumer Economics; Health; Education and Training; Welfare, Income, Wealth, and Poverty

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aes:amfeco:v:21:y:2019:i:51:p:347. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Valentin Dumitru (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aseeero.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.