IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/adr/anecst/y2005i79-80p749-757.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Price Index Aggregation: Plutocratic Weights, Democratic Weights, and Value Judgments

Author

Listed:
  • Frank M. Fisher

Abstract

The question of how to aggregate individual cost-of-living indexes is not a simple one. The recent National Research Council Panel's report (Schultze et al. [2002]) discusses two methods. The first, the "plutocratic" method uses expenditure weights in the aggregation; the second, the "democratic" method weights each household equally. This paper argues that the choice of weights depends on value judgments about income distribution. It is shown that, save in very special circumstances, neither the plutocratic nor the democratic method is satisfactory.

Suggested Citation

  • Frank M. Fisher, 2005. "Price Index Aggregation: Plutocratic Weights, Democratic Weights, and Value Judgments," Annals of Economics and Statistics, GENES, issue 79-80, pages 749-757.
    • Handle: RePEc:adr:anecst:y:2005:i:79-80:p:749-757
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20777595
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ehrmann, Michael & Tzamourani, Panagiota, 2012. "Memories of high inflation," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 28(2), pages 174-191.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:adr:anecst:y:2005:i:79-80:p:749-757. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Secretariat General or Laurent Linnemer (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ensaefr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.