IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/abk/jajeba/ajebasp.2011.338.346.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Free Enterprise and Entrepreneurship in Serbia: An Analysis of Motivations, Financing and Obstacles

Author

Listed:
  • Nina Radojevich-Kelley

Abstract

Problem statement: Entrepreneurship is considered to be a major driving force to economic development throughout the world. Free enterprise is challenging in any country, especially in a developing nation such as Serbia where communism and socialism prevailed for decades. The purpose of this study is to examine entrepreneurship and free enterprise in Serbia as well as the challenges or obstacles they face. The hope is to understand how Serbian entrepreneurs operate in their nation, especially since little is known about them. Approach: A questionnaire was designed and distributed to a sample of Serbian entrepreneurs. Descriptive statistics were calculated based on responses from participants. The study investigates 59 entrepreneurs; identifying commonalities in funding, motivation behind entrepreneurship and common challenges they face. Underlying similarities or differences are examined. Results: Empirical evidence indicates that the majority of Serbian entrepreneurs rely on equity funding to finance their ventures, form businesses to pursue personal freedom, bootstrap their nascent firms and provide services or represent/sell someone else’s products rather than create their own. Results indicate that the greatest challenges to Serbian business owners are with administrative issues associated with their government, political instability and economic uncertainty. Analogous to the USA, Serbian entrepreneurs create business for freedom, independence and monetary gain. Conclusion: The overall results of the study confirm the benefit of entrepreneurship in the transitioning economy, while highlighting the many obstacles that entrepreneurs face. Results indicate that entrepreneurship in Serbia is gaining interest due to the belief that it promotes a better life. Political instability, uncertainty about the future, difficulty obtaining clients and general inexperience pose the greatest threats to Serbian business owners. As entrepreneurship continues to expand in Serbia, they will have greater impact on the local and European economy. Any shifts or changes occurring in entrepreneurship should be examined closer in the future.

Suggested Citation

  • Nina Radojevich-Kelley, 2011. "Free Enterprise and Entrepreneurship in Serbia: An Analysis of Motivations, Financing and Obstacles," American Journal of Economics and Business Administration, Science Publications, vol. 3(2), pages 338-346, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:abk:jajeba:ajebasp.2011.338.346
    DOI: 10.3844/ajebasp.2011.338.346
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://thescipub.com/pdf/ajebasp.2011.338.346.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://thescipub.com/abstract/ajebasp.2011.338.346
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3844/ajebasp.2011.338.346?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Edmund H. Mantell, 2009. "A Theory of the Risks of Venture Capital Financing," American Journal of Economics and Business Administration, Science Publications, vol. 1(2), pages 194-205, June.
    2. Mojca Duh & Polona Tominc & Miroslav Rebernik, 2009. "The Importance of Family Enterprises in Transition Economies," Eastern European Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(6), pages 22-42, November.
    3. Shane, Scott, 1993. "Cultural influences on national rates of innovation," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 8(1), pages 59-73, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rakesh Sambharya & Martina Musteen, 2014. "Institutional environment and entrepreneurship: An empirical study across countries," Journal of International Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 12(4), pages 314-330, December.
    2. Guido Cozzi & Paolo Giordani, 2011. "Ambiguity attitude, R&D investments and economic growth," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 21(2), pages 303-319, May.
    3. Jessica Birkholz, 2022. "Persistence of Regional Entrepreneurship Patterns: Quantity and Quality of Regional Business Opportunity Perception," Bremen Papers on Economics & Innovation 2204, University of Bremen, Faculty of Business Studies and Economics.
    4. Sebastián Uriarte & Jorge Espinoza-Benavides & Domingo Ribeiro-Soriano, 2023. "Engagement in entrepreneurship after business failure. Do formal institutions and culture matter?," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 19(2), pages 941-973, June.
    5. Yadong Luo, 2006. "Autonomy of foreign R&D units in an emerging market: An information processing perspective," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 46(3), pages 349-378, June.
    6. Hasan, Rajibul & Lowe, Ben & Petrovici, Dan, 2020. "Consumer adoption of pro-poor service innovations in subsistence marketplaces," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 461-475.
    7. Minguzzi, Antonio & Passaro, Renato, 2001. "The network of relationships between the economic environment and the entrepreneurial culture in small firms," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 16(2), pages 181-207, March.
    8. Hansen, John D. & Deitz, George D. & Tokman, Mert & Marino, Louis D. & Weaver, K. Mark, 2011. "Cross-national invariance of the entrepreneurial orientation scale," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 26(1), pages 61-78, January.
    9. Nezameddin Faghih & Ebrahim Bonyadi & Lida Sarreshtehdari, 2021. "Assessing the entrepreneurship process: an application of the data envelopment analysis," Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, Springer;UNESCO Chair in Entrepreneurship, vol. 11(1), pages 311-327, December.
    10. De Clercq, Dirk & Danis, Wade M. & Dakhli, Mourad, 2010. "The moderating effect of institutional context on the relationship between associational activity and new business activity in emerging economies," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 19(1), pages 85-101, February.
    11. Naresh Khatri, 2009. "Consequences of Power Distance Orientation in Organisations," Vision, , vol. 13(1), pages 1-9, January.
    12. Hubner, Sylvia & Frese, Michael & Song, Zhaoli & Tripathi, Neha & Kaschner, Tamara & Le Kong, Xing, 2022. "An Asia-centric approach to team innovation: Cultural differences in exploration and exploitation behavior," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 408-421.
    13. Minbaeva, Dana & Rabbiosi, Larissa & Stahl, Günter K., 2018. "Not walking the talk? How host country cultural orientations may buffer the damage of corporate values’ misalignment in multinational corporations," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 53(6), pages 880-895.
    14. Diana Escandon-Barbosa & Agustin Ramirez & Jairo Salas-Paramo, 2022. "The Effect of Cultural Orientations on Country Innovation Performance: Hofstede Cultural Dimensions Revisited?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-13, May.
    15. Ron Boschma & Simona Iammarino & Raffaele Paci & Jordy Suriñach & Anneli Kaasa, 2017. "Culture and Innovation: Evidence from the European Union and Neighbouring Countries," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 108(1), pages 109-128, February.
    16. Kim Andrea & Moon Chul Woo & Kim Sang Kyun & Shin Jiseon & Koh You Sang, 2020. "An Empirical Investigation on the Psychological Antecedents of Social Entrepreneurship," Entrepreneurship Research Journal, De Gruyter, vol. 10(3), pages 1-18, July.
    17. Ricarda Bouncken & Alexander Brem & Sascha Kraus, 2016. "Multi-Cultural Teams As Sources For Creativity And Innovation: The Role Of Cultural Diversity On Team Performance," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 20(01), pages 1-34, January.
    18. Zichun Yan & Kai Wang & Sang-Bing Tsai & Lili Zhou, 2018. "An Empirical Study on Internet Startup Financing From a Green Financial Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-16, August.
    19. Robert N. Lussier & Sanja Pfeifer, 2000. "A Comparison of Business Success versus Failure Variables between U.S. and Central Eastern Europe Croatian Entrepreneurs," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 24(4), pages 59-67, July.
    20. Sander Wennekers & Roy Thurik & André Stel & Niels Noorderhaven, 2010. "Uncertainty Avoidance and the Rate of Business Ownership Across 21 OECD Countries, 1976–2004," Springer Books, in: Andreas Freytag & Roy Thurik (ed.), Entrepreneurship and Culture, chapter 0, pages 271-299, Springer.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:abk:jajeba:ajebasp.2011.338.346. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Jeffery Daniels (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://thescipub.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.