IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/abd/kauiea/v32y2019i1no2p23-42.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Shariah Screening Process of Capital Markets: An Evaluation of Methodologies عملية التدقيق الشرعي لأسواق رأس المال: تقييم المنهجيات

Author

Listed:
  • Muhammad Hanif

    (Assistant Professor Finance, College of Business Administration, Ajman University, UAE)

Abstract

This study highlights the issues in the screening process of Shariah-compliant stock universe from Shariah and professional perspectives. We have critically analyzed Shariah-compliance methodologies of selected (eight) institutions in the light of Islamic principles of business. The findings suggest multiple weaknesses in the process, including variations in tolerance limits (for haram-elements), variations in the use of calculation methods (total assets and market capitalization), insufficient income purification mechanism, and confusions about the application of bay' al-sarf and bay' al-dayn regulations. In addition, we find lack of revisions in the tolerance limits, corresponding to the expansion of the Islamic finance market. We also find that certain important areas, such as questionable marketing and sales practices and environmental damages, are ignored in filtration. This study proposes a Shariah-compliance rankings mechanism for Islamic stock markets, within agreed upon framework, based on the degree of violations. تسلط هذه الدراسة الضوء على أساليب وعمليات تصنيف الأسهم وفقا لمتطلبات الشريعة الإسلامية لتصنيف الأسهم من ناحية مهنية وشرعية. قمنا بتحليل نقدي لثمان مؤسسات لاختبار مدى التوافق مع مبادئ الشريعة الإسلامية. خلصت نتائج الدراسة إلى وجود العديد من السلبيات العملية منها: ما هو مخالف لأسس الشريعة الإسلامية، الاختلاف في أسس التقييم (قيمة الأصول للقيمة السوقية)، عدم كفاية أساليب تطهير الدخل وفقا للمنهج الإسلامي، عدم وضوح تطبيق نظم البيع، ضعف مراجعة حدود التفاوت، الفجوة في مواكبة نمو سوق التمويل الإسلامي، وكذلك الإخفاق في بعض الجوانب المتعلقة بعدم التحقق من بعض الممارسات البيئية وواقع عمليات البيع. تقترح الدراسة نموذجاً متوافقاً مع مبادئ الشريعة الإسلامية لتصنيف أسهم الأسواق الإسلامية في إطار متفق عليه ومبني على درجة الانحراف عن المبادئ الشرعية.

Suggested Citation

  • Muhammad Hanif, 2019. "Shariah Screening Process of Capital Markets: An Evaluation of Methodologies عملية التدقيق الشرعي لأسواق رأس المال: تقييم المنهجيات," Journal of King Abdulaziz University: Islamic Economics, King Abdulaziz University, Islamic Economics Institute., vol. 32(1), pages 23-42, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:abd:kauiea:v:32:y:2019:i:1:no:2:p:23-42
    DOI: 10.4197/Islec.32-1.2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://iei.kau.edu.sa/Files/121/Files/153868_32-01-02-MohammadHanif.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.4197/Islec.32-1.2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mohammad Obaidullah, 2009. "Some Issues In Shari’ah Compliance and Regulation of Islamic Funds بعض القضايا في الشريعة وتنظيم الأموال الإسلامية," Journal of King Abdulaziz University: Islamic Economics, King Abdulaziz University, Islamic Economics Institute., vol. 22(1), pages 191-193, January.
    2. Rehman Scheherazade S. & Askari Hossein, 2010. "An Economic IslamicityIndex (EI2)," Global Economy Journal, De Gruyter, vol. 10(3), pages 1-39, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Abdullah Muhammad Ahmed Ayedh & Muhammad Iqmal Hisham Kamaruddin & Amir Shaharuddin, 2019. "Challenging the Current Shariah Screening Methodology Assessments in Kuala Lumpur Shariah Index (KLSI)," International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, vol. 9(4), pages 253-268, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Emilia Justyna Powell & Steven Christian McDowell & Robert O’Brien & Julia Oksasoglu, 2021. "Islam-based legal language and state governance: democracy, strength of the judiciary and human rights," Constitutional Political Economy, Springer, vol. 32(3), pages 376-412, September.
    2. Abdullah Muhammad Ahmed Ayedh & Muhammad Iqmal Hisham Kamaruddin & Amir Shaharuddin, 2019. "Challenging the Current Shariah Screening Methodology Assessments in Kuala Lumpur Shariah Index (KLSI)," International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, vol. 9(4), pages 253-268, October.
    3. Adel Benhamed & Mohamed Sadok Gassouma, 2023. "Preventing Oil Shock Inflation: Sustainable Development Mechanisms vs. Islamic Mechanisms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-16, June.
    4. Akin, Tarik & Iqbal, Zamir & Mirakhor, Abbas, 2016. "The composite risk-sharing finance index: Implications for Islamic finance," Review of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 18-25.
    5. Balcılar, Mehmet & Demirer, Rıza & Hammoudeh, Shawkat, 2015. "Global risk exposures and industry diversification with Shariah-compliant equity sectors," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 35(PB), pages 499-520.
    6. W. A. Wan Omar & Fauzi Hussin & Asan Ali G. H., 2014. "The Trend Analysis of Islamization in Malaysia Using Islamization Index as Indicator," Asian Economic and Financial Review, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 4(10), pages 1298-1313, October.
    7. Hanif, Muhammad, 2018. "Sharīʿah Screening Process of Capital Markets: An Evaluation of Methodologies," OSF Preprints enx3p, Center for Open Science.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:abd:kauiea:v:32:y:2019:i:1:no:2:p:23-42. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: King Abdulaziz University, Islamic Economics Institute. (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cikausa.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.