IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aad/ejbejj/v11y2016i1p882.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Field Research On Occupational Ethics In Banking: The Comparison Of Ethics Perceptions Of Employees Working At The Banks In Karaman And Konya

Author

Listed:
  • Oğuzhan Aytar

    (Karamanoglu Mehmetbey University, Karaman)

  • İkbal Karataşlı

    (Karamanoglu Mehmetbey University, Karaman)

  • Namık Erdemir

    (Karamanoglu Mehmetbey University, Karaman)

Abstract

Today, at the helm of those issues mostly discussed and create trouble is the improperness of actions to the term of social responsibility. The case besides being accepted as a sub-title of the term of ethics, it can be claimed that the employees have the key role in practice for the point of origin of the ethics discussions. Because, the banks that traditionally provide monetary services, have free movement area in terms of the marketing of some services - despite various regulations. In brief, there exist staffs that use initiative. These initiatives involve different behaviour patterns by the staff to the customers according to their business volumes, giving more importance to more efficient customers and even un-fair practices such as those customers who object are right. However, due to the ethical rules, employees are obliged to procure the execution of activities in accordance with the foundation, objective and policies of the bank and to obey the principles of justice, accuracy, honesty and social responsibility for management. In the study it is mentioned clearly that employees and the management may use initiatives and the discussions on ethics may occur, and then a survey on the level of ethics of the employees working at the banks in Karaman and Konya is conducted. In the survey there are questions directed to demographic distribution and traditional scaled-questions directed to the level of understanding of some ethical issues, besides after presenting some real life cases the attendance of the responders is ensured through asking them to tell how they would behave in such cases. Then a comparison between the reflected (ideal) case and the practice (the reality) is made and some analyses are made on ethical values.

Suggested Citation

  • Oğuzhan Aytar & İkbal Karataşlı & Namık Erdemir, 2016. "Field Research On Occupational Ethics In Banking: The Comparison Of Ethics Perceptions Of Employees Working At The Banks In Karaman And Konya," European Journal of Business and Economics, Central Bohemia University, vol. 11(1), pages 8821:11-882, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:aad:ejbejj:v:11:y:2016:i:1:p:882
    DOI: 10.12955/ejbe.v11i1.882
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://ojs.journals.cz/index.php/EJBE/article/view/882/985
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.12955/ejbe.v11i1.882?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    EthicsBank Employees; Perception;

    JEL classification:

    • M12 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - Personnel Management; Executives; Executive Compensation
    • M19 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - Other
    • M40 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aad:ejbejj:v:11:y:2016:i:1:p:882. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Petr Hájek (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ojs.journals.cz/index.php/EJBE .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.