IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/r/kap/jecgro/v23y2018i1d10.1007_s10887-017-9146-y.html
   My bibliography  Save this item

Technology and labor regulations: theory and evidence

Citations

Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
as


Cited by:

  1. Filippo Belloc, 2015. "Employee Representation Legislations and Innovation," Department of Economics University of Siena 719, Department of Economics, University of Siena.
  2. Francesco Trebbi & Miao Ben Zhang, 2022. "The Cost of Regulatory Compliance in the United States," NBER Working Papers 30691, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
  3. Chen, Feng-Wen & Xu, Jingwei & Wang, Jiang & Li, Zhilong & Wu, Yongqiu, 2023. "Do rising labour costs promote technology upgrading? A novel theoretical hypothesis of an inverted U-shaped relationship," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 327-341.
  4. Guimarães, Luís & Mazeda Gil, Pedro, 2022. "Looking ahead at the effects of automation in an economy with matching frictions," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
  5. Philippe Aghion & Antonin Bergeaud & John Van Reenen, 2023. "The Impact of Regulation on Innovation," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 113(11), pages 2894-2936, November.
  6. Johanna Vogel & Kurt Kratena & Kathrin Hranyai, 2015. "The Bias of Technological Change in Europe. WWWforEurope Working Paper No. 98," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 58200.
  7. Filippo Belloc, 2015. "Employee Representation Legislations and Innovation," Department of Economics University of Siena 719, Department of Economics, University of Siena.
  8. Bernardo Fanfani, 2019. "The Employment Effects of Collective Bargaining," Working papers 064, Department of Economics and Statistics (Dipartimento di Scienze Economico-Sociali e Matematico-Statistiche), University of Torino.
  9. Andrea Caggese & Ozan Guler & Mike Mariathasan & Klaas Mulier, 2022. "Firing costs and productivity: Evidence from a natural experiment," Economics Working Papers 1853, Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra.
  10. Battisti, Michele & Gatto, Massimo Del & Parmeter, Christopher F., 2022. "Skill-biased technical change and labor market inefficiency," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
  11. M. Battisti & M. Del Gatto & A. F. Gravina & C. F. Parmeter, 2021. "Robots versus labor skills: a complementarity/substitutability analysis," Working Paper CRENoS 202104, Centre for North South Economic Research, University of Cagliari and Sassari, Sardinia.
  12. David Andersson & Mounir Karadja & Erik Prawitz, 2022. "Mass Migration and Technological Change," Journal of the European Economic Association, European Economic Association, vol. 20(5), pages 1859-1896.
  13. Battisti, Michele & Gravina, Antonio Francesco, 2021. "Do robots complement or substitute for older workers?," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 208(C).
  14. Broughel, James & Hahn, Robert, 2020. "The Impact of Economic Regulation on Growth: Survey and Synthesis," Working Papers 10409, George Mason University, Mercatus Center.
  15. Guimarães, Luís & Mazeda Gil, Pedro, 2022. "Explaining the Labor Share: Automation Vs Labor Market Institutions," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
  16. Gong, Min & He, Wei & Zhang, Nan, 2021. "Political promotion incentives and local employment," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 492-502.
  17. Silvio Traverso & Massimiliano Vatiero & Enrico Zaninotto, 2023. "Robots and labor regulation: a cross-country/cross-industry analysis," Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(7), pages 977-999, October.
  18. Jacob A. Kerspien & Jakob B. Madsen, 2024. "Markups, Tobin's q, and the Increasing Capital Share," Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 56(2-3), pages 569-587, March.
  19. Jean Mercenier & Ebru Voyvoda, 2021. "On barriers to technology adoption, appropriate technology and European integration," Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), Springer;Institut für Weltwirtschaft (Kiel Institute for the World Economy), vol. 157(3), pages 669-702, August.
  20. James Broughel & Robert W. Hahn, 2022. "The impact of economic regulation on growth: Survey and synthesis," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(2), pages 448-469, April.
  21. Mensah, Emmanuel B. & Owusu, Solomon & Foster-McGregor, Neil, 2023. "Productive efficiency, structural change, and catch-up within Africa," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 78-100.
  22. Olexandr Yemelyanov & Anastasiya Symak & Tetyana Petrushka & Roman Lesyk & Lilia Lesyk, 2018. "Assessment of the Technological Changes Impact on the Sustainability of State Security System of Ukraine," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-24, April.
  23. Hémous, David & Dechezleprêtre, Antoine & Olsen, Morten & Zanella, carlo, 2019. "Automating Labor: Evidence from Firm-level Patent Data," CEPR Discussion Papers 14249, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
  24. Jean Mercenier & Ebru Voyvoda, 2018. "On Barriers to Technology Adoption, Appropriate Technology and Deep Integration (with implications for the European Union)," ERC Working Papers 1806, ERC - Economic Research Center, Middle East Technical University, revised Apr 2018.
  25. Zeira, Joseph & Battisti, Michele, 2018. "Inequality and Public Policy," CEPR Discussion Papers 13134, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
  26. Fanfani, Bernardo, 2023. "The employment effects of collective wage bargaining," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
  27. Bürgisser, Reto, 2023. "Policy Responses to Technological Change in the Workplace," SocArXiv kwxn2, Center for Open Science.
  28. Zeira, Joseph & Nakamura, Hideki, 2018. "Automation and Unemployment: Help is on the Way," CEPR Discussion Papers 12974, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
  29. Kong, Dongmin & Liu, Shasha & Xiang, Junyi, 2018. "Political promotion and labor investment efficiency," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 273-293.
IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.