IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/vfsc19/203518.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Old-age poverty: The household perspective : a microsimulation approach of pension entitlements in Germany

Author

Listed:
  • Finkler, Sebastian

Abstract

Providing a decent living standard and preventing old-age poverty are the two major challenges of pension insurance schemes. Replacement rates below the poverty line despite many years of contribution represent a major challenge for public pension schemes with respect to the systems "raison d'être". The focus of the present paper turns away from individual perspective and considers household retirement incomes in the light of analysing old-age poverty and designing (minimum) pension policies. Using household survey and administrative data, the paper examines actual needs of pensioner households in relation to the means-tested minimum pension. The simulation results suggest that 56% of those living in couple households would achieve a pension level lower than means-tested minimum pension if they were considered at the individual level. The findings clearly indicate gender discrepancies: households represent a noticeable insurance function. Especially women are better off if old-age poverty analysis integrates other household incomes. The German government intends to implement the Grundrente in 2019. This minimum pension policy entitles individuals who spent more than 35 contribution years to a 10% mark-up on the means-tested minimum pension. The microsimulation analysis also provides important findings regarding the extent of entitled beneficiaries. Whilst 30% of all new pensions would benefit from an individual perspective, after means-testing only 3% at all will meet the conditions of 35 contribution years which strongly questions the target orientation of the Grundrente.

Suggested Citation

  • Finkler, Sebastian, 2019. "Old-age poverty: The household perspective : a microsimulation approach of pension entitlements in Germany," VfS Annual Conference 2019 (Leipzig): 30 Years after the Fall of the Berlin Wall - Democracy and Market Economy 203518, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
  • Handle: RePEc:zbw:vfsc19:203518
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/203518/1/VfS-2019-pid-26544.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lin Zhang, 2013. "Saving and retirement behavior under quasi-hyperbolic discounting," Journal of Economics, Springer, vol. 109(1), pages 57-71, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Piotr Bialowolski & Dorota Weziak-Bialowolska, 2014. "The Index of Household Financial Condition, Combining Subjective and Objective Indicators: An Appraisal of Italian Households," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 118(1), pages 365-385, August.
    2. Johannes Hagen & Daniel Hallberg & Gabriella Sjögren, 2022. "A Nudge to Quit? The Effect of a Change in Pension Information on Annuitisation, Labour Supply and Retirement Choices Among Older Workers," The Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 132(643), pages 1060-1094.
    3. Takuya Katauke & Sayaka Fukuda & Mostafa Saidur Rahim Khan & Yoshihiko Kadoya, 2023. "Financial Literacy and Impulsivity: Evidence from Japan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-14, April.
    4. Gopi Shah Goda & Matthew Levy & Colleen Flaherty Manchester & Aaron Sojourner & Joshua Tasoff, 2019. "Predicting Retirement Savings Using Survey Measures Of Exponential‐Growth Bias And Present Bias," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 57(3), pages 1636-1658, July.
    5. Paul Calcott & Vladimir Petkov, 2022. "Excessive consumption and present bias," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 74(1), pages 113-134, July.
    6. Gopi Shah Goda & Matthew R. Levy & Colleen Flaherty Manchester & Aaron Sojourner & Joshua Tasoff, 2015. "The Role of Time Preferences and Exponential-Growth Bias in Retirement Savings," NBER Working Papers 21482, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    7. Park, Hyeon, 2023. "Bounded rationality and optimal retirement age," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Old-Age Poverty; Pension Reform; Minimum Pension; Microsimulation; German Public Pension System;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C15 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General - - - Statistical Simulation Methods: General
    • H55 - Public Economics - - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies - - - Social Security and Public Pensions
    • J14 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics - - - Economics of the Elderly; Economics of the Handicapped; Non-Labor Market Discrimination
    • J18 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics - - - Public Policy
    • J26 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demand and Supply of Labor - - - Retirement; Retirement Policies

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:vfsc19:203518. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/vfsocea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.