IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/iatfor/042019.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Rückwärts in die Zukunft? Ein Essay zur jüngsten Debatte um Industriepolitik

Author

Listed:
  • Rehfeld, Dieter
  • Terstriep, Judith

Abstract

* Die aktuelle industriepolitische Debatte ist überfällig, ignoriert jedoch zentrale Herausforderungen. * Gefragt ist nicht eine erneute ordnungspolitische Diskussion, sondern eine Diskussion über Konzepte, Strategien und Instrumente. * Industriepolitik sollte sich nicht mehr vor allem durch Marktversagen begründen, sondern benötigt einen gesellschaftspolitischen Bezugspunkt. * Im Mittelpunkt der Diskussion sollten nicht einzelne Unternehmen, sondern Wertschöpfungsnetze stehen, die industrielle Produktion und Dienstleistungen verbinden. * Gefragt sind eine neues Innovationsverständnis, die Nutzung politischer Instrumente (Nachfrage, Regulierung) zur Förderung qualitativ hochwertiger Nachfrage sowie eine Wertschätzung kompetenter Arbeit.

Suggested Citation

  • Rehfeld, Dieter & Terstriep, Judith, 2019. "Rückwärts in die Zukunft? Ein Essay zur jüngsten Debatte um Industriepolitik," Forschung Aktuell 04/2019, Institut Arbeit und Technik (IAT), Westfälische Hochschule, University of Applied Sciences.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:iatfor:042019
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/194806/1/1662617003.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Philippe Aghion & Julian Boulanger & Elie Cohen, 2011. "Rethinking industrial policy," Policy Briefs 566, Bruegel.
    2. Rehfeld, Dieter & Dankbaar, Ben, 2015. "Industriepolitik: Theoretische Grundlagen, Varianten und Herausforderungen," WSI-Mitteilungen, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 68(7), pages 491-499.
    3. Patrizio Bianchi & Sandrine Labory (ed.), 2006. "International Handbook on Industrial Policy," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 3451.
    4. Stiglitz, Joseph E. & Yifu, Justin & Monga, Celestin, 2013. "The rejuvenation of industrial policy," Policy Research Working Paper Series 6628, The World Bank.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mattia Tassinari & Marco R. Di Tommaso, 2014. "Open Innovation Practices: Measuring, Economic Performance, And Industrial Policy Issues. An Analysis Of The Italian Manufacturing System," Working Papers 1406, c.MET-05 - Centro Interuniversitario di Economia Applicata alle Politiche per L'industria, lo Sviluppo locale e l'Internazionalizzazione, revised Dec 2014.
    2. Michael Böheim, 2016. "Umweltpolitik als Kernelement einer systemischen Industriepolitik zur Förderung eines nachhaltigen Wirtschaftswachstums," WIFO Monatsberichte (monthly reports), WIFO, vol. 89(1), pages 39-46, January.
    3. Ferrannini, Andrea & Barbieri, Elisa & Biggeri, Mario & Di Tommaso, Marco R., 2021. "Industrial policy for sustainable human development in the post-Covid19 era," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    4. Di Tommaso, Marco R. & Tassinari, Mattia & Barbieri, Elisa & Marozzi, Marco, 2020. "Selective industrial policy and ‘sustainable’ structural change. Discussing the political economy of sectoral priorities in the US," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 309-323.
    5. Reis, Anabela & Heitor, Manuel & Amaral, Miguel & Mendonça, Joana, 2016. "Revisiting industrial policy: Lessons learned from the establishment of an automotive OEM in Portugal," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 113(PB), pages 195-205.
    6. Matthias Firgo & Peter Mayerhofer, 2015. "Wissens-Spillovers und regionale Entwicklung - welche strukturpolitische Ausrichtung optimiert des Wachstum?," Working Paper Reihe der AK Wien - Materialien zu Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft 144, Kammer für Arbeiter und Angestellte für Wien, Abteilung Wirtschaftswissenschaft und Statistik.
    7. Alje van Dam & Koen Frenken, 2020. "Vertical vs. Horizontal Policy in a Capabilities Model of Economic Development," Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) 2037, Utrecht University, Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Group Economic Geography, revised Aug 2020.
    8. Zheng, Guo & Barbieri, Elisa & Di Tommaso, Marco R. & Zhang, Lei, 2016. "Development zones and local economic growth: zooming in on the Chinese case," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 238-249.
    9. Boeing, Philipp & Eberle, Jonathan & Howell, Anthony, 2022. "The impact of China's R&D subsidies on R&D investment, technological upgrading and economic growth," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    10. repec:zbw:iamodp:163932 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Karl Aiginger, 2013. "A New Strategy for the European Periphery," WIFO Working Papers 443, WIFO.
    12. Mealy, Penny & Teytelboym, Alexander, 2017. "Economic Complexity and the Green Economy," INET Oxford Working Papers 2018-03, Institute for New Economic Thinking at the Oxford Martin School, University of Oxford, revised Feb 2019.
    13. Zsolt Darvas & Jean Pisani-Ferry, 2011. "Europe's growth emergency," Policy Contributions 623, Bruegel.
    14. Joao Gaspar & Gilson Pina & Marta Simoes, 2014. "Agriculture in Portugal: linkages with industry and services," Review of Agricultural and Environmental Studies - Revue d'Etudes en Agriculture et Environnement, INRA Department of Economics, vol. 95(4), pages 437-471.
    15. Shastitko, A., 2014. "Industrial and Competition Policy: from Theory to Practice of Interaction," Journal of the New Economic Association, New Economic Association, vol. 22(2), pages 205-209.
    16. López-Estornell, Manuel & Tortajada Esparza, Enrique & Martinez-Chafer, l, 2012. "The evolution toward vagueness of industrial district concept and its impact on regional innovation policy," INGENIO (CSIC-UPV) Working Paper Series 201211, INGENIO (CSIC-UPV).
    17. Ng, Wei Keat Benny & Appel-Meulenbroek, Rianne & Cloodt, Myriam & Arentze, Theo, 2019. "Towards a segmentation of science parks: A typology study on science parks in Europe," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(3), pages 719-732.
    18. Karl Aiginger, 2013. "A Southern Europe strategy based on vision and industrial policy," EKONOMIAZ. Revista vasca de Economía, Gobierno Vasco / Eusko Jaurlaritza / Basque Government, vol. 82(01), pages 127-168.
    19. Olga Romanova & Yevgeniy Starikov, 2015. "Changes in the Vector of Industrial Policy and Possibilities for Innovative Development of the Industrial Regions," Economy of region, Centre for Economic Security, Institute of Economics of Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, vol. 1(3), pages 322-333.
    20. Martin Gornig & Claudia Kemfert, 2022. "Energiewende steht für die Chance auf Re-Industrialisierung, nicht für De-Industrialisierung [Energy Transition as an Opportunity for Re-Industrialisation]," Wirtschaftsdienst, Springer;ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 102(12), pages 933-935, December.
    21. Kushlin, Valery Ivanovich (Кушлин, Валерий Иванович) & Ustenko, V.S. (Устенко, В.С.), 2016. "Analysis of International Experience of Intensification of Scientific and Innovative Activity in the Modern Unstable Conditions [Анализ Международного Опыта Активизации Научно-Инновационной Деятель," Working Papers 2832, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:iatfor:042019. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iatgede.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.