One Size Fits All? Specialization, Trade and Income Inequality
AbstractPrevious research has uncovered precious little support for Heckscher-Ohlin trade theory. This paper demonstrates that those efforts focus on an overly restrictive version of the model. Indeed, strong evidence that output is a function of endowments can be found if we recognize that countries with sufficiently disparate endowments specialize in different subsets of goods. This paper develops a technique for differentiating specialization from an equilibrium in which all countries produce the same goods. It also demonstrates that the industry aggregates used in previous studies hide a substantial degree of cross-country price and input intensity heterogeneity, violating the assumptions of the model and rendering previous results difficult to interpret. When traditional aggregates are corrected to account for this heterogeneity, support for specialization increases. Finally, this paper contributes to the current debate on trade and wages by illustrating that in 1990 the US was sufficiently capital abundant to have an output mix distinct from that of by low wage, labor abundant countries. This specialization mitigates the ability of cheap imports to adversely affect US workers, casting doubt on the argument that international trade is raising US income inequality.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoPaper provided by Yale School of Management in its series Yale School of Management Working Papers with number ysm132.
Date of creation: 02 Dec 1999
Date of revision:
Find related papers by JEL classification:
- C21 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Single Equation Models; Single Variables - - - Cross-Sectional Models; Spatial Models; Treatment Effect Models
- F14 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Empirical Studies of Trade
- F2 - International Economics - - International Factor Movements and International Business
- F11 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Neoclassical Models of Trade
You can help add them by filling out this form.
CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
- Branko Milanovic, 2003.
"Can We Discern The Effect Of Globalization On Income Distribution? Evidence From Household Surveys,"
- Branko Milanovic, 2005. "Can We Discern the Effect of Globalization on Income Distribution? Evidence from Household Surveys," World Bank Economic Review, World Bank Group, vol. 19(1), pages 21-44.
- Branko Milanovic, 2003.
"CAN WE DISCERN THE EFFECT OF GLOBALIZATION ON INCOME DISTRIBUTION? Evidence from Household Budget Surveys,"
- Milanovic, Branko, 2002. "Can we discern the effect of globalization on income distribution? evidence from household budget surveys," Policy Research Working Paper Series 2876, The World Bank.
- Andrew B. Bernard & J. Bradford Jensen, 2001.
"Who Dies? International Trade, Market Structure, and Industrial Restructuring,"
NBER Working Papers
8327, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Andrew B Bernard & J Bradford Jensen, 2001. "Who Dies? International Trade, Market Structure, and Industrial Restructuring," Working Papers 01-04, Center for Economic Studies, U.S. Census Bureau.
- Wang-Sheng Lee, 2007. "Immigration and Wages: An Open Economy Model," Melbourne Institute Working Paper Series wp2007n07, Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, The University of Melbourne.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ().
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.