IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/wpa/wuwpmi/0402002.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Evaluation of the Mutual Recognition Schemes

Author

Listed:
  • Productivity Commission

Abstract

In January 2003, the Government asked the Commission to undertake a study into the Mutual Recognition Agreement (MRA) and Trans-Tasm an Mutual Recognition Arrangement (TTMRA).

Suggested Citation

  • Productivity Commission, 2004. "Evaluation of the Mutual Recognition Schemes," Microeconomics 0402002, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    • Handle: RePEc:wpa:wuwpmi:0402002
    Note: Type of Document - pdf; prepared on NT; to print on HP; pages: 396; figures: included
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://econwpa.ub.uni-muenchen.de/econ-wp/mic/papers/0402/0402002.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Productivity Commission, 2005. "Australian and New Zealand Competition and Consumer Protection Regimes," Research Reports, Productivity Commission, Government of Australia, number 15.
    2. Productivity Commission, 2006. "Australia's Health Workforce," Research Reports, Productivity Commission, Government of Australia, number 18.
    3. Productivity Commission, 2009. "Performance Benchmarking of Australian and New Zealand Business Regulation - Food Safety," Research Reports, Productivity Commission, Government of Australia, number 38.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wpa:wuwpmi:0402002. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: EconWPA (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://econwpa.ub.uni-muenchen.de .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.