Divide and Conquer
AbstractTournaments are well known to be vulnerable to collusion as shown by the impossibility theorem in Ishiguro (2004), which asserts that efficient effort levels are impossible to be implemented through a collusion-proof contract. However, we argue that this impossibility is a product of simple mechanisms that prevail in collusion-proof mechanism design. In this paper, we explore more sophisticated mechanisms with discrimination and asymmetric information to prevent collusion, outlining the principle of “divide and conquer”. As a result, we establish a possibility theorem of implementing efficient effort levels, and thus break down the impossibility theorem in Ishiguro (2004).
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoPaper provided by EconWPA in its series Labor and Demography with number 0504012.
Length: 21 pages
Date of creation: 28 Apr 2005
Date of revision:
Note: Type of Document - pdf; pages: 21
Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://22.214.171.124
Collusion; Discrimination; Moral Hazard; Tournament Model;
Find related papers by JEL classification:
- D20 - Microeconomics - - Production and Organizations - - - General
- J30 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Wages, Compensation, and Labor Costs - - - General
This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:
You can help add them by filling out this form.
CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
- Chen, Zhijun, 2006. "Fighting Collusion in Tournaments," MPRA Paper 872, University Library of Munich, Germany.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (EconWPA).
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.