IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/wop/jopovw/126.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Are There Economic Barriers to Visiting a Doctor?

Author

Listed:
  • Susan E. Mayer

Abstract

Despite concerns about inequalities in the provision of health care in the United States, and despite a considerable amount of previous research, we know little about the distribution of medical services across income or more broadly defined socioeconomic groups. This paper uses a unique data file from the Health Interview Survey to estimate the effect of income on whether an individual visits the doctor in a year, the number of doctor visits in a year, the likelihood that a visit is in an emergency room, and the likelihood that a visit is with a medical specialist. The results suggest that differences in income play a minor role in explaining why some people who need medical care get it while others do not. Low income children are more likely than high income children with the same health status to have visited a doctor in the last year, and low income children visit the doctor as often in a year as high income children with the same health status. Low income children are only slightly more likely than high income children with the same health status to visit a doctor in an emergency room, and they are somewhat less likely to see a pediatrician or other medical specialist. Low income adults are about as likely as high income adults with the same health status to visit a doctor at least once during the year, but low income adults visit the doctor more frequently than high income adults with the same health status during a year. Low income adults are about as likely as high income adults with the same health status to visit a doctor in an emergency room and to visit a specialist. To receive a copy of this paper, please e-mail the Harris School.

Suggested Citation

  • Susan E. Mayer, 1999. "Are There Economic Barriers to Visiting a Doctor?," JCPR Working Papers 126, Northwestern University/University of Chicago Joint Center for Poverty Research.
  • Handle: RePEc:wop:jopovw:126
    Note: This paper is not available for download
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Other versions of this item:

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wop:jopovw:126. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thomas Krichel (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/jcuchus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.