This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Measuring the Effects of Public Support Schemes on Firms' Innovation Activities. Survey Evidence from Austria

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
Rahel Falk (WIFO)
Abstract

This paper discusses conceptual frameworks for measuring the effects of innovation policy and begins with applying conventional descriptive methods to explore how firms rate and rank the merits of public intervention. Based on survey data from some 1200 Austrian firms we then challenge the hypothetical survey question ("What would you have done if public support was denied?") by comparing the respective answers with changes that actually occurred when public assistance was refused. This is a contribution to the ongoing literature as is the attempt to relate any of the observed additionalities to the firms' characteristics, their perceived barriers to innovation and the degree they make use of the public support system. The effects of policy interventions prove to be cumulative in a dual sense. On the one hand, our results confirm the well-known notion that large firms make the best use of funds. On the other hand, substantial changes in the way a company undertakes R&D&I-related activities appear to only result from multiple policy interventions of different kinds. While supported firms tend to immediately increase their resources devoted to innovation projects, the result-based concepts of additionality only come into effect once a threshold level of intervention has been reached. Acknowledging that a public innovation support system already incentivises potential beneficiaries to change their innovation-related behaviour, and that eventual success in terms of outcomes does not arise from some discrete support measure, but from the synergies of multiple policy action, we conclude that future work should focus more on the evaluation of portfolios of programmes and their interactions.

Download Info
To download:

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. Information about this may be contained in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help file. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://www.wifo.ac.at/wwa/jsp/index.jsp?fid=23923&id=25914&typeid=8&display_mode=2&pub_language=2&language=2
File Format: text/html
File Function: Abstract
Download Restriction: no
File URL: http://www.wifo.ac.at/wwa/servlet/wwa.upload.DownloadServlet/bdoc/PRIVATE27066/WP_2006_267$.PDF
File Format: application/pdf
File Function: full text
Download Restriction: no

Publisher Info
Paper provided by WIFO in its series WIFO Working Papers with number 267.

Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML, plain text, BibTeX, RIS (EndNote), ReDIF
Length: 25 pages
Date of creation: 18 Jan 2006
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:wfo:wpaper:y:2006:i:267

Contact details of provider:
Postal: A-1103 Wien, Postfach 91
Phone: (+43 1) 798 26 01-0
Fax: (+43 1) 798 93 86
Web page: http://www.wifo.ac.at/
More information through EDIRC

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Ilse Schulz).

Related research
Keywords: innovation policy policy evaluation methods

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

  1. Bruce Tether, 2003. "The sources and aims of innovation in services: variety between and within sectors," Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Taylor and Francis Journals, vol. 12(6), pages 481-505, January. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  2. Georghiou, Luke & Roessner, David, 2000. "Evaluating technology programs: tools and methods," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 29(4-5), pages 657-678, April. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  3. Klette, T.J. & Moen, J. & Griliches, Z., 1999. "Do Subsidies to Commercial R&D Reduce Market Failures? Microeconometric Evaluation Studies," Papers 16/99, Norwegian School of Economics and Business Administration-.
    Other versions:
  4. Luukkonen, Terttu, 2000. "Additionality of EU framework programmes1," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 29(6), pages 711-724, June. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  5. José García-Quevedo, 2004. "Do Public Subsidies Complement Business R&D? A Meta-Analysis of the Econometric Evidence," Kyklos, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 57(1), pages 87-102, 02. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  6. Freeman, Chris, 1994. "The Economics of Technical Change," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Oxford University Press, vol. 18(5), pages 463-514, October.
  7. Stoneman, Paul & Vickers, John, 1988. "The Assessment: The Economics of Technology Policy," Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 4(4), pages i-xvi, Winter.
Full references

Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? IDEAS was launched in September 1997.

This page was last updated on 2008-9-25.


This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.