This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Decentralizing in Transition Economies: A Tragedy of the Commons?

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
Daniel M. Berkowitz
Wei Li

Additional information is available for the following registered author(s):

Abstract

China began its gradual economic reform in the late 1970s; Russia initiated radical reform in the early 1990s. During the course of reform, China has enjoyed rapid growth while Russia has contracted. This paper argues that an important explanation for the striking performance difference in China and Russia is that, during the course of reform, Chinese local governments have gained much more clearly defined tax rights than their counterparts in Russia. When tax rights are sharply defined, a local government has the exclusive right to tax enterprises located within its territory. These rights become fuzzier as the number of agencies which independently tax enterprises increases. The implications of these differences in government tax rights are analyzed using a model of a local economy which predicts that: 1) investment is higher when tax rights are more clearly defined- 2) local tax collections and local provision of public goods and infrastructure are higher when tax rights are more sharply defined; 3) the effective tax rate for investors increases as tax rights become fuzzier; 4) tax evasion is higher when tax rights are fuzzier. It is argued that these four points capture important differences in the performance of local Chinese and Russian economies. The model also predicts that capital mobility tends to encourage local and regional governments to limit cross-border capital flows. This prediction is consistent with local and regional government policies observed in both China and Russia.

Download Info
To download:

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. Information about this may be contained in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://www.wdi.umich.edu/files/Publications/WorkingPapers/wp45.pdf
File Format:
File Function:
Download Restriction: no

Publisher Info
Paper provided by William Davidson Institute at the University of Michigan Stephen M. Ross Business School in its series William Davidson Institute Working Papers Series with number 45.

Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML (with abstract), plain text (with abstract), BibTeX, RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite), ReDIF
Length: pages
Date of creation: 01 Sep 1997
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:wdi:papers:1997-45

Contact details of provider:
Postal: 724 E. University Ave. Wyly Hall, Floor 1, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-1234
Phone: 734 615 4566
Fax: (734) 763-5850
Email:
Web page: http://www.wdi.umich.edu
More information through EDIRC

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Patricia Loh).

Related research
Keywords:

Find related papers by JEL classification:
H77 - Public Economics - - State and Local Government; Intergovernmental Relations - - - Intergovernmental Relations; Federalism
P35 - Economic Systems - - Socialist Institutions and Their Transitions - - - Public Finance

This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? Use the JEL tree to browse through the database by subfields.

This page was last updated on 2009-10-23.


This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.