IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/uwe/wpaper/20151501.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Principles- versus rules-based output statistical disclosure control in remote access environments

Author

Listed:
  • Felix Ritchie

    (University of the West of England, Bristol)

  • Mark Elliot

    (University of Manchester)

Abstract

In recent years, the level of detail in confidential data made available to social scientists has increased dramatically. Much of this has been due to the growth in secure data access facilities, which allow access to the most detailed data under strictly controlled conditions. One element of that control is checking to ensure that statistical outputs do not present any residual disclosure risk. Traditionally this has been managed by specifying rules for researchers to follow, but it is increasingly recognised that a ‘principles-based’ approach can be both more secure and more cost-effective. The principles-based approach requires a higher level of expertise from the facility managers, and places the subjective assessment of risk at the forefront of decision-making; these two factors often make facility managers uncomfortable. In addition, knowledge of this approach is concentrated amongst a relatively small community, whereas the rules-based model has been the dominant approach for half a century; facility managers may not be aware that there is an alternative perspective. This paper reviews the arguments for the two different approaches. The two are not mutually exclusive: both take simple rules as a starting point, but the rules-based approach also finishes there. This has advantages in some circumstances, but this paper demonstrates that the value of the principles-based approach increases with the sensitivity of the data and gives more freedom to the researchers to innovate. The paper considers how the two approaches can be implemented. It notes that, although the principles-based model requires greater initial investment by both the facility managers and researchers, the necessary training can bring substantial auxiliary benefits to the facility manager. The paper therefore concludes that a principles-based approach has advantages in many circumstances, and it is essential for the remote research data centres which dominate access solutions for the most sensitive data.

Suggested Citation

  • Felix Ritchie & Mark Elliot, 2015. "Principles- versus rules-based output statistical disclosure control in remote access environments," Working Papers 20151501, Department of Accounting, Economics and Finance, Bristol Business School, University of the West of England, Bristol.
  • Handle: RePEc:uwe:wpaper:20151501
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www2.uwe.ac.uk/faculties/BBS/BUS/Research/Economics%20Papers%202015/1501.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gail Pacheco & De Wet van der Westhuizen & Don J. Webber, 2012. "The changing influence of culture on job satisfaction across Europe: 1981-2008," Working Papers 2012-06, Auckland University of Technology, Department of Economics.
    2. Felix Ritchie, 2014. "Resistance to change in government: risk, inertia and incentives," Working Papers 20141412, Department of Accounting, Economics and Finance, Bristol Business School, University of the West of England, Bristol.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tanvi Desai & Felix Ritchie & Richard Welpton, 2016. "Five Safes: designing data access for research," Working Papers 20161601, Department of Accounting, Economics and Finance, Bristol Business School, University of the West of England, Bristol.
    2. Talei Parker, 2017. "The DataLab of the Australian Bureau of Statistics," Australian Economic Review, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, vol. 50(4), pages 478-483, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Felix Ritchie & Richard Welpton, 2014. "Addressing the human factor in data access: incentive compatibility, legitimacy and cost-effectiveness in public data resources," Working Papers 20141413, Department of Accounting, Economics and Finance, Bristol Business School, University of the West of England, Bristol.
    2. Hilary Drew & Anna King & Ritchie Felix, 2014. "How do knowledge brokers work? The case of WERS," Working Papers 20141403, Department of Accounting, Economics and Finance, Bristol Business School, University of the West of England, Bristol.
    3. Whittard, Damian, 2015. "Reflections on the one-minute paper," International Review of Economics Education, Elsevier, vol. 20(C), pages 1-12.
    4. Iris Biefang-Frisancho Mariscal, 2013. "Risk-taking and monetary policy before the crisis: The case of Germany," Working Papers 20131308, Department of Accounting, Economics and Finance, Bristol Business School, University of the West of England, Bristol.
    5. Wessam M. T. Abouarghoub & Iris Biefang-Frisancho Mariscal, 2011. "Measuring level of risk exposure in tanker Shipping freight markets," International Journal of Business and Social Research, MIR Center for Socio-Economic Research, vol. 1(1), pages 20-44, December.
    6. Torugsa, Nuttaneeya (Ann) & Arundel, Anthony, 2017. "Rethinking the effect of risk aversion on the benefits of service innovations in public administration agencies," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(5), pages 900-910.
    7. Peter Howells, 2013. "The US Fed and the Bank of England: Ownership, structure and 'independence'," Working Papers 20131311, Department of Accounting, Economics and Finance, Bristol Business School, University of the West of England, Bristol.
    8. Wessam Abouarghoub & Iris Biefang-Frisancho Mariscal & Peter Howells, 2013. "A two-state Markov-switching distinctive conditional variance application for tanker freight returns," Working Papers 20131314, Department of Accounting, Economics and Finance, Bristol Business School, University of the West of England, Bristol.
    9. Woon Wong & Iris Biefang-Frisancho Mariscal & Wanru Yao & Peter Howells, 2013. "Liquidity and credit risks in the UK’s financial crisis," Working Papers 20131301, Department of Accounting, Economics and Finance, Bristol Business School, University of the West of England, Bristol.
    10. Ritchie, Felix, 2017. "Spontaneous recognition: an unnecessary control on data access?," Statistics Paper Series 24, European Central Bank.
    11. Hans-Peter Hafner & Felix Ritchie & Rainer Lenz, 2015. "User-focused threat identification for anonymised microdata," Working Papers 20151503, Department of Accounting, Economics and Finance, Bristol Business School, University of the West of England, Bristol.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Data access; data security; statistical disclosure control; principles-based output SDC; rules-based; output SDC; researcher management; remote access;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D78 - Microeconomics - - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making - - - Positive Analysis of Policy Formulation and Implementation
    • D81 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Criteria for Decision-Making under Risk and Uncertainty
    • Y10 - Miscellaneous Categories - - Data: Tables and Charts - - - Data: Tables and Charts
    • C80 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Data Collection and Data Estimation Methodology; Computer Programs - - - General
    • D03 - Microeconomics - - General - - - Behavioral Microeconomics: Underlying Principles

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:uwe:wpaper:20151501. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Jo Michell (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/seuweuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.