IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ubc/clssrn/clsrn_admin-2012-30.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Labour Market Matters - November 2012

Author

Listed:
  • Tran, Vivian

Abstract

With the move by women into the paid labour force over the last four decades, and the increasing need to have more than one income to raise a family, parents and employers are increasingly calling on governments to support high-quality non-parental care for young children. Without a doubt, Quebec is the leader among Canadian provinces in developing policies to transform their early childhood education and care system. Specifically, in 1997, Quebec revised its family policy away to include a significant increase in the number of licensed child care places available to children living in the province, and access to child care at a rate of $5 per day (increased to $7 per day in 2004) for parents with children aged 0-4. Surveys of Quebec residents continuously demonstrate that these policies are enormously popular. These responses have led to universal publically funded child care occupying a growing place on political agendas in the rest of Canada. In a paper entitled “New Evidence on the Impacts of Access to and Attending Universal Childcare in Canada†(CLSRN Working Paper no. 105), CLSRN affiliates Michael J. Kottelenberg and Steven F. Lehrer (both of Queen’s University) evaluate the impacts of the introduction of universal childcare in Quebec and find that the results reported in earlier work demonstrating that access to subsidized child care actually had negative impacts on individual developmental, behavioural, and health measures do not vanish in more recent years when suppliers gained experience providing child care in the new policy environment. Several expansions of universal early childhood programs have occurred across Canada in recent years. Expenditures on the Federal Universal Child Care Benefit are estimated to be near $2.6 billion in 2010/11. In British Columbia, New Brunswick, Nova Scotia, P.E.I., and Quebec, full-day kindergarten has been made available to 5-year-olds, and to 4- and 5-year-olds in Ontario. A universal, public child care and early education program for children starting from birth was introduced in Quebec in the 1990s. Justifications for universal early childhood programs include better socialization of children, better educational outcomes, and better socio-economic outcomes in the future. In a paper entitled “Universal early childhood interventions: what is the evidence base?†* CLSRN affiliate Michael Baker (University of Toronto) argues that the case for universal early childhood interventions does not have a strong foundation in evidence. In his analysis, Baker reviews programs that target children who are infants, toddlers, and preschoolers. * This paper was also released as CLSRN Working Paper no. 86

Suggested Citation

  • Tran, Vivian, 2012. "Labour Market Matters - November 2012," CLSSRN working papers clsrn_admin-2012-30, Vancouver School of Economics, revised 29 Nov 2012.
  • Handle: RePEc:ubc:clssrn:clsrn_admin-2012-30
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.clsrn.econ.ubc.ca/Labour%20Market%20Matters%20-%20November%202012.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ellison, Brenna & Bernard, John C. & Paukett, Michelle & Toensmeyer, Ulrich C., 2016. "The influence of retail outlet and FSMA information on consumer perceptions of and willingness to pay for organic grape tomatoes," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 109-119.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Early Childhood Intervention; Childcare; Universal Childcare;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • J13 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics - - - Fertility; Family Planning; Child Care; Children; Youth
    • J18 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics - - - Public Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ubc:clssrn:clsrn_admin-2012-30. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Vivian Tran (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.clsrn.econ.ubc.ca/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.