Industrial Specialisation and Public Procurement: Theory and Empirical Evidence
AbstractThis paper explores the impact of home-biased public procurement on the location of industries. It is shown theoretically and empirically that discriminatory procurement can offset other locational determinants. In the theoretical part, we demonstrate that a bias in public procurement towards domestically produced goods can counter agglomeration forces substantially. The empirical analysis draws on a cross-country, cross-industry data sample for the EU. In the full sample, the market-based determinants of industry location identified in the theory are significant in explaining EU industrial specialisation. However, these determinants lose statistical significance in the sub-sample of procurement-sensitive industries. In this sub-sample, proxies for the degree of liberalisation of public procurement relate positively to specialisation.
Download InfoTo our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.
Bibliographic InfoPaper provided by Trinity College Dublin, Department of Economics in its series Economics Technical Papers with number 983.
Date of creation: Jan 1998
Date of revision:
Other versions of this item:
- Brülhart, Marius & Trionfetti, Federico, 2001. "Industrial Specialisation and Public Procurement: Theory and Empirical Evidence," Journal of Economic Integration, Center for Economic Integration, Sejong University, vol. 16, pages 106-127.
- F12 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Models of Trade with Imperfect Competition and Scale Economies; Fragmentation
- F15 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Economic Integration
- H57 - Public Economics - - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies - - - Procurement
You can help add them by filling out this form.
CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
- Marius BRÜLHART & Federico TRIONFETTI, 1999.
"Home-Biased Demand and International Specialisation : A Test of Trade Theories,"
Cahiers de Recherches Economiques du DÃ©partement d'EconomÃ©trie et d'Economie politique (DEEP)
9918, Université de Lausanne, Faculté des HEC, DEEP.
- Marius Brulhart & Federico Trionfetti, 2000. "Home-Biased Demand and International Specialisation: A Test of Trade Theories," Econometric Society World Congress 2000 Contributed Papers 0031, Econometric Society.
- Eric Strobl, 2004. "Trends and Determinants of the Geographic Dispersion of Irish Manufacturing Activity, 1926- 1996," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(2), pages 191-205.
- Shingal, Anirudh, 2013. ""New" econometric evidence for the Baldwin-Richardson (1972)/Miyagiwa (1991) theoretical predictions in government procurement," MPRA Paper 49138, University Library of Munich, Germany.
- Pierre M. Picard & Dao‐Zhi Zeng, 2010.
"A Harmonization Of First And Second Natures,"
Journal of Regional Science,
Wiley Blackwell, vol. 50(5), pages 973-994, December.
- Gianmarco I.P. Ottaviano, 2001.
"Footloose Capital, Market Access, and the Geography of Regional State Aid,"
Development Working Papers
155, Centro Studi Luca d\'Agliano, University of Milano.
- Ottaviano, Gianmarco I. P., 2001. "Footloose capital, market access, and the geography of regional state aid," HWWA Discussion Papers 132, Hamburg Institute of International Economics (HWWA).
- Federico Trionfetti, 1999. "On the home market effect: theory and empirical evidence," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 20215, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
- Rolf Weder, 2003. "Comparative home-market advantage: An empirical analysis of British and American exports," Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), Springer, vol. 139(2), pages 220-247, June.
- F Trionfetti, 1999. "On the Home Market Effect: Theory and Empirical Evidence," CEP Discussion Papers dp0430, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Patricia Hughes).
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.