There is evidence of growing plurality in economic theory, alongside an increasing degree of homogenisation at the level of methodology. The purpose of this paper is to explore these developments in the light of the methodological literature on pluralism, regarding meaning of plurality, and the arguments for it. Issues raised by plurality are then explored: regarding mathematical formalism, the ‘anything goes’ approach, and the rationale for schools of thought. It is concluded that, if plurality is not to take the form of ‘anything goes’, then critical discussion by economists of different approaches to economics, and of pluralism itself, is required.
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Find related papers by JEL classification: B4 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - Economic Methodology B5 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - Current Heterodox Approaches
References listed on IDEAS Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
repec:cup:jhisec:v:22:y:2000:i:02:p:149-155_00 is not listed on IDEAS
Other versions: