This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Connecting principles, new combinations and routines

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
Brian J. Loasby (Department of Economics, University of Stirling, Scotland)

Additional information is available for the following registered author(s):

Abstract

This paper reflects on the contributions of Adam Smith and Joseph Schumpeter on our understanding of economic development, routines and cognition. It distinguishes between two conceptions of economic analysis, one Cartesian in nature, the other following an developmental perspective that resists formalisation.

Download Info
To download:

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. Information about this may be contained in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://www.sceme.org.uk/wps/SCEME001_LoasbyB_ConnecTPrinc_2003.pdf
File Format: application/pdf
File Function:
Download Restriction: no

Publisher Info
Paper provided by SCEME in its series SCEME Working Papers: Advances in Economic Methodology with number 001/2003.

Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML (with abstract), plain text (with abstract), BibTeX, RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite), ReDIF
Length: 14 pages
Date of creation: Jan 2003
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:sti:wpaper:001/2003

Contact details of provider:
Email:
Web page: http://www.sceme.org.uk/
More information through EDIRC

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Matthias Klaes).

Related research
Keywords: Joseph-Schumpeter; Adam-Smith; economic-development; innovation; uncertainty;

Find related papers by JEL classification:
B0 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - General
B4 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - Economic Methodology
O0 - Economic Development, Technological Change, and Growth - - General

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

  1. Brian J. Loasby, 2002. "Content and method: an epistemic perspective on some historical episodes," European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor and Francis Journals, vol. 9(1), pages 72-95, March. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  2. Young, Allyn A., 1928. "Increasing Returns and Economic Progress," History of Economic Thought Articles, McMaster University Archive for the History of Economic Thought, vol. 38, pages 527-542. [Downloadable!]
  3. Michael D. Cohen & Roger Burkhart & Giovanni Dosi & Massimo Egidi & Luigi Marengo & Massimo Warglien & Sidney Winter & with comments by Benjamin Coriat, 1995. "Routines and Other Recurring Action Patterns of Organizations: Contemporary Research Issues," Working Papers 95-11-101, Santa Fe Institute.
Full references

Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? You can use IDEAS to provide links to papers and articles in your course syllabus.

This page was last updated on 2009-11-25.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.