LOLF from the vantage point of the university
AbstractThe Framework Law on Finance Acts (Loi Organique sur les Lois de Finance - LOLF) was passed by the French Parliament in 2001 and came into force in January 2006. As budget legislation it refocuses the relationship between rulers and ruled by modifying the connection between the state budget and operation of public structures, especially universities. These effects are interpreted in the present contribution with the help of a neo-institutionalist reference framework. In the first part, we set out a panoramic view of sectoral and organizational changes in higher education prior to LOLF. Despite various legislations during the 80s and 90s, the vast majority of universities failed to gain greater autonomy and to strengthen themselves as institutions, each with its own university-wide policies and governance. It is only with the LMD (licence-master-doctorate) reform that these professional bureaucracies started to destabilize. The study conducted at a pilot university experimenting with LOLF shows that the memory of earlier waves of reform is a structuring factor in players’ understanding of LOLF, paving the way for a deeper transformation. In the second part, the effects of LOLF are analysed in terms of their impact on information systems and of the tools put in place by universities. These include local management tools and those, like the four-year contact, introduced by the previous reforms of the sector. Based on a survey at two different universities, we point to a reorganization of interactions between the different bodies responsible for higher education, a reorganization that also is reflected within the university, particularly in relation to its component parts. At the heart of this process we observe a refocusing on the four-year contract, but "lolf-icized", and an impact on internal management tools, albeit highly dependent on local initiatives and internal capabilities. Part three discusses the possible extension of these results by bringing into the analysis the context created by the 2007 Law on University Freedoms and Responsibilities (Libertés et responsabilités universitaires - LRU).
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoPaper provided by ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles in its series Working Papers CEB with number 10-018.RS.
Length: 22 p.
Date of creation: 2010
Date of revision:
Publication status: Published by:
Contact details of provider:
Postal: CP114/03, 42 avenue F.D. Roosevelt, 1050 Bruxelles
Phone: +32 (0)2 650.48.64
Fax: +32 (0)2 650.41.88
Web page: http://difusion.ulb.ac.be
More information through EDIRC
This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:
- NEP-ALL-2010-03-13 (All new papers)
- NEP-EDU-2010-03-13 (Education)
- NEP-LAB-2010-03-13 (Labour Economics)
You can help add them by filling out this form.
reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.Access and download statistics
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Benoit Pauwels).
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.