IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/sip/dpaper/12-015.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Increasing Wireless Value: Technology, Spectrum, and Incentives

Author

Listed:
  • Gregory L. Rosston

    (Stanford Institute of Economy Policy Research)

Abstract

Demand for wireless service has been growing rapidly. But while quantity of wireless service (measured in terms of bytes or minutes) has increased dramatically, price has increased little, if at all. This paper examines how supply of wireless capacity has increased and how it can continue to increase in the future. Given that there is little prospect for finding currently unused spectrum, the government should institute policies that promote the economically efficient use of spectrum currently in use, which in turn could make spectrum available for alternative uses. The best way for the government to promote spectrum efficiency is to ensure that users have flexibility and that they realize the opportunity cost of their use of spectrum. Two areas where users do not realize the opportunity cost of their use of spectrum are broadcasting and government and rules regarding those uses can be revised. In addition, the government should adopt market mechanisms to determine the opportunity cost of spectrum designated for unlicensed use.

Suggested Citation

  • Gregory L. Rosston, 2013. "Increasing Wireless Value: Technology, Spectrum, and Incentives," Discussion Papers 12-015, Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research.
    • Handle: RePEc:sip:dpaper:12-015
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www-siepr.stanford.edu/repec/sip/12-015.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Thomas W. Hazlett, 2008. "Optimal Abolition of FCC Spectrum Allocation," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 22(1), pages 103-128, Winter.
    2. Paul Milgrom & Jonathan Levin & Assaf Eilat, 2011. "The Case for Unlicensed Spectrum," Discussion Papers 11-002, Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research.
    3. Rosston, Gregory L. & Topper, Michael D., 2010. "An antitrust analysis of the case for wireless network neutrality," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 22(1), pages 103-119, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Elizabeth Hoffman & Matthew L. Spitzer, 2011. "The Enduring Power of Coase," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 54(S4), pages 63-76.
    2. Shinohara, Sobee & Akematsu, Yuji & Morikawa, Hiroyuki & Tsuji, Masatsugu, 2013. "Current issues of the Japanese mobile phone market caused by smartphones," 24th European Regional ITS Conference, Florence 2013 88528, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
    3. Amnon Levy & Benoit Freyens, 2011. "Optimal Control of Broadcasting Spectrum with a Variety-Reception Tradeoff and Consumers’ Income Sensitivity," Economics Working Papers wp11-14, School of Economics, University of Wollongong, NSW, Australia.
    4. Shinohara, Sobee & Morikawa, Hiroyuki & Tsuji, Masatsugu, 2014. "Empirical analysis of mobile broadband adoption in major six countries from the view of competition policy," 20th ITS Biennial Conference, Rio de Janeiro 2014: The Net and the Internet - Emerging Markets and Policies 106849, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
    5. Teckshawer Tom, 2023. "5G Impacts, Internet of Things (IoT) and Businesses in Developing Countries," Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, vol. 46(1), pages 87-104, August.
    6. Kim, Yongwon & Kim, Yongkyu, 2020. "The Value of Wi-Fi as Entertainment: An Application to Free Wi-Fi in City Buses of Korea," ITS Conference, Online Event 2020 224863, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
    7. Jain, Rekha & Dara, Rishabh, 2017. "Framework for evolving spectrum management regimes: Lessons from India," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(5), pages 473-485.
    8. Hazlett, Thomas W. & Muñoz, Roberto E., 2009. "Spectrum allocation in Latin America: An economic analysis," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 21(4), pages 261-278, November.
    9. Amnon Levy & Michael R. Caputo & Benoît Pierre Freyens, 2013. "Royalties, Entry and Spectrum Allocation to Broadcasting," Economics Working Papers wp13-02, School of Economics, University of Wollongong, NSW, Australia.
    10. Dmitrii Trubnikov, 2017. "Analysing the Impact of Regulation on Disruptive Innovations: The Case of Wireless Technology," Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, Springer, vol. 17(4), pages 399-420, December.
    11. Reed, David & Lansford, James, 2014. "Wi-Fi as a Commercial Service: New Technology and Policy Implications," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(8), pages 827-837.
    12. Rai, Suyash & Muttreja, Dhiraj & Banerjee, Sudipto & Mishra, Mayank, 2018. "The Economics of Releasing the V-band and E-band Spectrum in India," Working Papers 18/226, National Institute of Public Finance and Policy.
    13. Suyash Rai & Dhiraj Muttreja & Sudipto Banerjeec & Mayank Mishra, 2018. "The Economics of Releasing the V-band and E-band Spectrum in India," Working Papers id:12836, eSocialSciences.
    14. Vogelsang, Ingo, 2019. "Has Europe missed the endgame of telecommunications policy?," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(1), pages 1-10.
    15. Thomas W. Hazlett & Roberto E. Muñoz, 2009. "A welfare analysis of spectrum allocation policies," RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, vol. 40(3), pages 424-454, September.
    16. Minervini, Leo Fulvio, 2014. "Spectrum management reform: Rethinking practices," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(2), pages 136-146.
    17. Katz, Raul Luciano & Beltrán, Fernando, 2015. "Socio-economic impact of alternative spectrum assignment approaches in Latin America," 2015 Regional ITS Conference, Los Angeles 2015 146321, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
    18. Cao, Xiaoyong & Gong, Jiong, 2017. "The tradeoff of the commons under stochastic use," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 150-161.
    19. Thành Nguyen & Hang Zhou & Randall A. Berry & Michael L. Honig & Rakesh Vohra, 2016. "The Cost of Free Spectrum," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 64(6), pages 1217-1229, December.
    20. Rabah Arezki & Vianney Dequiedt & Rachel Yuting Fan & Carlo Maria Rossotto, 2021. "Working Paper 352 - Liberalization, Technology Adoption, and Stock Returns: Evidence from Telecom," Working Paper Series 2478, African Development Bank.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sip:dpaper:12-015. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Anne Shor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cestaus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.