IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/sek/iacpro/7309997.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Revealed Preference Methods in Economic Valuation of Environmental Goods: A Review

Author

Listed:
  • Sara Sousa

    (IPC - ISCAC)

Abstract

The environmental goods and services have often been neglected in crucial decisions affecting the environment mainly because the difficulty in estimating their economic value, since we are dealing with non-market goods and, thus, without a price associated. Nevertheless, the inexistence of prices does not necessarily mean these goods have no value. The environment is a key element in today's society that seeks to be as sustainable as possible, where the environmental assets have both use and non-use values. To estimate the use value, researchers may apply the revealed preference methods. This paper provides a theoretical review of the main concepts and methodologies on the economic valuation of the environment, with particular emphasis on the revealed preference techniques. Based on a detailed literature review, this study concludes that, despite some inherent limitations, the revealed preference methodologies are valuable tools for the economic evaluation of the environment. The main purpose of this study is to contribute to an increased theoretical information on the economic valuation of environmental assets, allowing researchers and policy makers to improve future decisions regarding the environment.

Suggested Citation

  • Sara Sousa, 2018. "The Revealed Preference Methods in Economic Valuation of Environmental Goods: A Review," Proceedings of International Academic Conferences 7309997, International Institute of Social and Economic Sciences.
  • Handle: RePEc:sek:iacpro:7309997
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://iises.net/proceedings/43rd-international-academic-conference-lisbon/table-of-content/detail?cid=73&iid=044&rid=9997
    File Function: First version, 2018
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Economic Valuation; Environmental Goods; Revealed Preference Methods; Total Economic Value.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • Q50 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - General
    • Q51 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Valuation of Environmental Effects

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sek:iacpro:7309997. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Klara Cermakova (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://iises.net/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.