IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/rri/wpaper/2018wp06.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Implicit Regional Economic Goals and Objectives: A Study of U.S. Development Programs

Author

Listed:
  • Peter Schaeffer

    (Resource Economics and Management, West Virginia University)

  • Randall Jackson

    (Regional Research Institute, West Virginia University)

  • Eric Bowen

    (Bureau of Business and Economic Research, West Virgina University)

Abstract

At the present time, U.S. regional economic development policies tend to be focused on sectors, infrastructure, human capital, innovation capability, or to be problem oriented, and only a few programs can be described as being place-based. In this paper, we are looking at major federal regional development programs to deduce their combined implicit place-based goals and objectives. Because the U.S. seems to be relatively unique among OECD countries in its scant use of place-based policies, we compare the United States to, in particular, Canada to gain further insights into the reasons for and potential effects of such policy differences.

Suggested Citation

  • Peter Schaeffer & Randall Jackson & Eric Bowen, 2018. "Implicit Regional Economic Goals and Objectives: A Study of U.S. Development Programs," Working Papers Working Paper 2018-06, Regional Research Institute, West Virginia University.
    • Handle: RePEc:rri:wpaper:2018wp06
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/rri_pubs/40/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:rre:publsh:v:35:y:2005:i:3:p:266-90 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Nizalov, Denys & Loveridge, Scott, 2005. "The Differential Impact of Regional Policies on Economic Growth: One Size Does Not Fit All," 2005 Annual meeting, July 24-27, Providence, RI 19360, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    3. Mark Drabenstott, 2008. "An Effective Overhaul of Federal Economic Development Policy," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 22(2), pages 92-98, May.
    4. Amy Glasmeier & Lawrence Wood, 2005. "Policy Debates Analysis of US Economic Development Administration Expenditure Patterns over 30 Years," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(9), pages 1261-1274.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pula Lekë & Elshani Alban, 2018. "Role of Public Expenditure in Economic Growth: Econometric Evidence from Kosovo 2002–2015," Baltic Journal of Real Estate Economics and Construction Management, Sciendo, vol. 6(1), pages 74-87, June.
    2. Gebremeskel Gebremariam & Tesfa Gebremedhin & Peter Schaeffer, 2012. "County-level determinants of local public services in Appalachia: a multivariate spatial autoregressive model approach," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 49(1), pages 175-190, August.
    3. Kwideok Han & Brian Whitacre & Inbae Ji, 2020. "Estimating the Impacts of EDA Public Works Program Investments on County Employment," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 34(3), pages 283-293, August.
    4. Mark D. Partridge & Dan S. Rickman & Kamar Ali & M. Rose Olfert, 2008. "The Geographic Diversity of U.S. Nonmetropolitan Growth Dynamics: A Geographically Weighted Regression Approach," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 84(2), pages 241-266.
    5. Ann Markusen & Amy Glasmeier, 2008. "Overhauling and Revitalizing Federal Economic Development Programs," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 22(2), pages 83-91, May.
    6. Loveridge, Scott & Nizalov, Denys, 2007. "Increasing the Equity and Efficiency of Tax Abatement Programs," Journal of Regional Analysis and Policy, Mid-Continent Regional Science Association, vol. 37(1), pages 1-5.
    7. Scott Loveridge & Denys Nizalov, 2007. "Operationalizing the Entrepreneurial Pipeline Theory: An Empirical Assessment of the Optimal Size Distribution of Local Firms," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 21(3), pages 244-262, August.
    8. Peter V. Schaeffer & Scott Loveridge, 2009. "Regional Science and State Rural Policy Research," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 32(4), pages 509-522, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    regional development; national policy; implicit goals;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • O2 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Development Planning and Policy
    • R0 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General
    • L52 - Industrial Organization - - Regulation and Industrial Policy - - - Industrial Policy; Sectoral Planning Methods

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rri:wpaper:2018wp06. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Randall Jackson (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rrwvuus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.