IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ris/adbiwp/0645.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Evolving Walkability of Major Cities in the People’s Republic of China

Author

Listed:
  • Fan, Peilei

    (Asian Development Bank Institute)

  • Wan, Guanghua

    (Asian Development Bank Institute)

  • Xu, Lihua

    (Asian Development Bank Institute)

  • Park, Hogeun

    (Asian Development Bank Institute)

  • Xie, Yaowen

    (Asian Development Bank Institute)

  • Liu, Yong

    (Asian Development Bank Institute)

  • Yue, Wenze

    (Asian Development Bank Institute)

  • Chen, Jiquan

    (Asian Development Bank Institute)

Abstract

Walkability is an important element for assessing urban sustainability. As the People’s Republic of China (PRC) rapidly urbanizes, there are increased concerns that more of its cities have become less walkable. We aim to develop a composite walkability index to evaluate the spatiotemporal evolution of the walkability of PRC cities. We developed a comprehensive walkability index that integrates five aspects of the urban built environment: dwelling density, street connectivity, land-use mix, access to public transit, and elevation variation. Using Shanghai, Hangzhou, Chongqing, and Lanzhou as cases, we evaluated the spatiotemporal patterns and changes of walkability in the context of rapid urban expansion. All four cities expanded their urban land from 1990 to 2010, but that there was a higher expansion rate in 2000–2010 than in 1990–2000. For inner cities, Shanghai had the highest average walkability index, whereas Lanzhou held the lowest. In 2000–2010, however, the inner cities of Hangzhou, Chongqing, and Lanzhou and the entire cities of Shanghai and Chongqing increased their walkability index, whereas the inner city of Shanghai had decreased walkability. Furthermore, while inner cities of Shanghai and Hangzhou experienced decreased or stable walkability, inner cities of Lanzhou and Chongqing enjoyed moderate to high increases in walkability. The spatiotemporal changes in walkability seem to be directly associated with governmental policies at both central and local levels. The walkability index method can be widely implemented for any urban landscape because of its comprehensiveness, simplicity, and flexibility.

Suggested Citation

  • Fan, Peilei & Wan, Guanghua & Xu, Lihua & Park, Hogeun & Xie, Yaowen & Liu, Yong & Yue, Wenze & Chen, Jiquan, 2017. "Evolving Walkability of Major Cities in the People’s Republic of China," ADBI Working Papers 645, Asian Development Bank Institute.
  • Handle: RePEc:ris:adbiwp:0645
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.adb.org/sites/default/files/publication/223501/adbi-wp645.pdf
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lovasi, G.S. & Neckerman, K.M. & Quinn, J.W. & Weiss, C.C. & Rundle, A., 2009. "Effect of individual or neighborhood disadvantage on the association between neighborhood walkability and body mass index," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 99(2), pages 279-284.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hamdi Lemamsha & Chris Papadopoulos & Gurch Randhawa, 2018. "Perceived Environmental Factors Associated with Obesity in Libyan Men and Women," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-16, February.
    2. Bradley Bereitschaft, 2017. "Equity in Microscale Urban Design and Walkability: A Photographic Survey of Six Pittsburgh Streetscapes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-20, July.
    3. Michael, Yvonne L. & Nagel, Corey L. & Gold, Rachel & Hillier, Teresa A., 2014. "Does change in the neighborhood environment prevent obesity in older women?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 129-137.
    4. Yunwon Choi & Heeyeun Yoon, 2020. "Do the Walkability and Urban Leisure Amenities of Neighborhoods Affect the Body Mass Index of Individuals? Based on a Case Study in Seoul, South Korea," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-20, March.
    5. Peter Congdon, 2010. "A Multilevel Model for Comorbid Outcomes: Obesity and Diabetes in the US," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-20, January.
    6. Feuillet, T. & Valette, J.F. & Charreire, H. & Kesse-Guyot, E. & Julia, C. & Vernez-Moudon, A. & Hercberg, S. & Touvier, M. & Oppert, J.M., 2020. "Influence of the urban context on the relationship between neighbourhood deprivation and obesity," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 265(C).
    7. Hoehner, Christine M. & Handy, Susan L. & Yan, Yan & Blair, Steven N. & Berrigan, David, 2011. "Association between neighborhood walkability, cardiorespiratory fitness and body-mass index," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 73(12), pages 1707-1716.
    8. Su, Shiliang & Zhou, Hao & Xu, Mengya & Ru, Hu & Wang, Wen & Weng, Min, 2019. "Auditing street walkability and associated social inequalities for planning implications," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 62-76.
    9. Kelin Li & Ming Wen & Kevin A. Henry, 2014. "Residential Racial Composition and Black-White Obesity Risks: Differential Effects of Neighborhood Social and Built Environment," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-17, January.
    10. Sune Djurhuus & Henning S. Hansen & Mette Aadahl & Charlotte Glümer, 2014. "The Association between Access to Public Transportation and Self-Reported Active Commuting," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-20, December.
    11. Julia Koschinsky & Emily Talen & Mariela Alfonzo & Sungduck Lee, 2017. "How walkable is Walker’s paradise?," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 44(2), pages 343-363, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    urban planning; urban development; urban landscape; Shanghai; Hangzhou; Chongqing; Lanzhou; walkability index; dwelling density; street connectivity; land-use mix; public transit; elevation;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • O18 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Urban, Rural, Regional, and Transportation Analysis; Housing; Infrastructure

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ris:adbiwp:0645. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ADB Institute (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/adbinjp.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.