IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/qld/uq2004/369.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

FROM GALBRAITH TO KRUGMAN AND BACK Galbraith, Krugman and 'Good Economics'

Author

Abstract

J.K. Galbraith's heyday was in the 1950s-70s. He was one of the most cited economists of his time, and attracted much praise and blame. In 1994, Krugman was a caustic critic and dismissed Galbraith's influence as a victory of style over substance. He castigated Galbraith as but �a policy entrepreneur�, yet by 2004, Krugman appeared to have undergone a striking metamorphosis, and his New York Times columns (2000-2006) conspicuously echo Galbraith�s understanding of socio-economic issues. This newer Krugman questions consumer sovereignty, bemoans the power of producers, questions the uses to which State power is put, worries about a medical-industrial complex, and laments the hijacking of public policy by private interests. Is this new Krugman merely a journalist, who has left scientific economics behind, or has he 'seen the light' as to what really constitutes 'good economics' and a more holistic scientific procedure?

Suggested Citation

  • L.A. Duhs, 2008. "FROM GALBRAITH TO KRUGMAN AND BACK Galbraith, Krugman and 'Good Economics'," Discussion Papers Series 369, School of Economics, University of Queensland, Australia.
    • Handle: RePEc:qld:uq2004:369
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://economics.uq.edu.au/files/44592/369.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Galbraith, John Kenneth, 1970. "Economics as a System of Belief," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 60(2), pages 469-478, May.
    2. Galbraith, John Kenneth, 1973. "Power and the Useful Economist," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 63(1), pages 1-11, March.
    3. William Breit, 1984. "Galbraith and Friedman: Two Versions of Economic Reality," Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(1), pages 18-29, September.
    4. Warren J. Samuels, 1984. "Galbraith on Economics as a System of Professional Belief," Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(1), pages 61-76, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Adem LEVENT, 2016. "Power, Market and Techno-Structure in John Kenneth Galbraith’s Thought," Journal of Social and Administrative Sciences, KSP Journals, vol. 3(2), pages 214-218, June.
    2. Alexandre Chirat & Charlotte Le Chapelain, 2017. "Some “unexpected proximities” between Schultz and Galbraith on human capital," Working Papers of BETA 2017-18, Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée, UDS, Strasbourg.
    3. Alexandre Chirat & Charlotte Le Chapelain, 2017. "Some “unexpected proximities” between Schultz and Galbraith on human capital," Working Papers 08-17, Association Française de Cliométrie (AFC).
    4. Alexandre Chirat, 2021. "When Berle and Galbraith brought political economy back to life : Study of a cross-fertilization (1933-1967)," EconomiX Working Papers 2021-27, University of Paris Nanterre, EconomiX.
    5. Luca Colombo & Paola Labrecciosa & Patrick Paul Walsh, 2005. "Optimal Corporation Tax: An I.O. Approach," The Institute for International Integration Studies Discussion Paper Series iiisdp97, IIIS.
    6. James Boyce, 1994. "Inequality as a Cause of Environmental Degradation," Published Studies ps1, Political Economy Research Institute, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.
    7. James Boyce, 2003. "Inequality and Environmental Protection," Working Papers wp52, Political Economy Research Institute, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.
    8. Henry G. Grabowski, 1976. "The Effects of Advertising on the Interindustry Distribution of Demand," NBER Chapters, in: Explorations in Economic Research, Volume 3, number 1, pages 21-75, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    9. Wolfgang Fellner & Clive L. Spash, 2014. "The Illusion of Consumer Sovereignity in Economic and Neoliberal Thought," SRE-Disc sre-disc-2014_02, Institute for Multilevel Governance and Development, Department of Socioeconomics, Vienna University of Economics and Business.
    10. Yew‐Kwang Ng, 1974. "Harcourt's Survey of Capital Theory," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 50(1), pages 119-129, March.
    11. Sean Alley & John Marangos, 2006. "A Comparative Political Economy Approach to Farming Interest Groups in Australia and the United States," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 65(3), pages 497-524, July.
    12. Servaas Storm, 2021. "Labour's loss: Why macroeconomics matters," PSL Quarterly Review, Economia civile, vol. 74(299), pages 249-285.
    13. Servaas Storm, 2019. "Labor Laws and Manufacturing Performance in India: How Priors Trump Evidence and Progress Gets Stalled," Working Papers Series 90, Institute for New Economic Thinking.
    14. Joseph E. Stiglitz, 1989. "Symposium on Microeconomics: 1 Reflections on the State of Economics: 1988," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 65(1), pages 66-72, March.
    15. Charles Wright, 1977. "A note on the decision rules of public regulatory agencies," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 31(1), pages 151-155, September.
    16. Wolfgang Fellner & Benedikt Goehmann, 2017. "Human Needs and the Measurement of Welfare," SRE-Disc sre-disc-2017_07, Institute for Multilevel Governance and Development, Department of Socioeconomics, Vienna University of Economics and Business.
    17. Jason L. Saving, 2006. "Consumer Sovereignty in the Modern Global Era," Journal of Private Enterprise, The Association of Private Enterprise Education, vol. 22(Fall 2006), pages 107-119.
    18. Anna Klimina, 2013. "Placing the Analysis of Contemporary State Capitalism within an Evolutionary Discourse," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(2), pages 545-554.
    19. Efstathios Tapinos & Graham Leask & Mike Brown, 2023. "Perceived environmental turbulence and corporate strategy: The case of the UK recession," Futures & Foresight Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 5(3-4), September.
    20. Nijkamp, P., 1985. "Equity and efficiency in environmental policy analyses : separability versus inseparability," Serie Research Memoranda 0004, VU University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics, Business Administration and Econometrics.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:qld:uq2004:369. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SOE IT (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/decuqau.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.