IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/pri/econom/2020-55.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Visual attention modulates the integration of goal-relevant evidence and not value

Author

Listed:
  • Pradyumna Sepulveda

    (University College London)

  • Marius Usher

    (Tel Aviv University)

  • Ned Davies

    (University College London)

  • Amy Benson

    (University College London)

  • Pietro Ortoleva

    (Princeton University)

Abstract

When choosing between options, such as food items presented in plain view, people tend to choose the option they spend longer looking at. The prevailing interpretation is that visual attention increases value. However, in previous studies, ‘value’ was coupled to a behavioural goal, since subjects had to choose the item they preferred. This makes it impossible to discern if visual attention has an effect on value, or, instead, if attention modulates the information most relevant for the goal of the decision-maker. Here we present the results of two independent studies—a perceptual and a value-based task—that allow us to decouple value from goal-relevant information using specific task-framing. Combining psychophysics with computational modelling, we show that, contrary to the current interpretation, attention does not boost value, but instead it modulates goal-relevant information. This work provides a novel and more general mechanism by which attention interacts with choice.

Suggested Citation

  • Pradyumna Sepulveda & Marius Usher & Ned Davies & Amy Benson & Pietro Ortoleva, 2020. "Visual attention modulates the integration of goal-relevant evidence and not value," Working Papers 2020-55, Princeton University. Economics Department..
  • Handle: RePEc:pri:econom:2020-55
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.04.14.031971v1.full.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. repec:jdm:journl:v:17:y:2022:i:6:p:1287-1312 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Amasino, Dianna R. & Dolgin, Jack & Huettel, Scott A., 2023. "Eyes on the account size: Interactions between attention and budget in consumer choice," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    3. repec:cup:judgdm:v:17:y:2022:i:6:p:1287-1312 is not listed on IDEAS

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Value-based decision; Metacognition; Attention; Computational Modelling; Framing; Eye-tracking;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D70 - Microeconomics - - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making - - - General
    • D79 - Microeconomics - - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making - - - Other

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pri:econom:2020-55. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Bobray Bordelon (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://economics.princeton.edu/working-papers/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.