IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/pra/mprapa/93263.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Teaching and Learning Schumpeter: A Dialogue Between Professor and Student

Author

Listed:
  • Dalton, John
  • Logan, Andrew

Abstract

Joseph Schumpeter's contributions to economics, including theories about innovation and entrepreneurship, creative destruction, and the debate over capitalism versus socialism, all remain relevant today. There is evidence, however, that Schumpeter's ideas have long received less attention in the classroom than they deserve given the importance economists attach to them. This paper provides a description of a discussion-based course on Schumpeter. Using a dialogue between professor and student before, during, and after the course, we describe the structure of the course and specific details related to content. We also include a syllabus, sources for class materials, and a list of over forty discussion questions. The dialogue allows us to show the dynamic nature of a discussion-based class, something we think Schumpeter would approve.

Suggested Citation

  • Dalton, John & Logan, Andrew, 2019. "Teaching and Learning Schumpeter: A Dialogue Between Professor and Student," MPRA Paper 93263, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    • Handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:93263
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/93263/1/MPRA_paper_93263.pdf
    File Function: original version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Robert J. Gordon, 2016. "The Rise and Fall of American Growth: The U.S. Standard of Living since the Civil War," Economics Books, Princeton University Press, edition 1, number 10544.
    2. Diamond, Arthur M., 2009. "Schumpeter Vs. Keynes: €Œin The Long Run Not All Of Us Are Deadâ€," Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Cambridge University Press, vol. 31(4), pages 531-541, December.
    3. Barbara J. Phipps & Robert J. Strom & William J. Baumol, 2012. "Principles of Economics Without the Prince of Denmark," The Journal of Economic Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(1), pages 58-71, January.
    4. Philippe Aghion & Steven Durlauf (ed.), 2014. "Handbook of Economic Growth," Handbook of Economic Growth, Elsevier, edition 1, volume 2, number 2.
    5. John T. Dalton & Lillian R. Gaeto, 2022. "Schumpeter vs. Keynes redux: “Still not dead”," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 89(2), pages 569-592, October.
    6. Simonson, G. R., 1964. "Missiles and Creative Destruction in the American Aircraft Industry, 1956–19611," Business History Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 38(3), pages 302-314, October.
    7. Arthur M. Diamond Jr., 2007. "The Neglect of Creative Destruction in Micro-Principles Texts," History of Economic Ideas, Fabrizio Serra Editore, Pisa - Roma, vol. 15(1), pages 197-210.
    8. Elizabeth J. Jensen & Ann L. Owen, 2003. "Appealing to Good Students in Introductory Economics," The Journal of Economic Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(4), pages 299-325, December.
    9. Michael Watts & Georg Schaur, 2011. "Teaching and Assessment Methods in Undergraduate Economics: A Fourth National Quinquennial Survey," The Journal of Economic Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(3), pages 294-309, July.
    10. Arthur M. Diamond, Jr., 2009. "Using Video Clips to Teach Creative Destruction," Journal of Private Enterprise, The Association of Private Enterprise Education, vol. 25(Fall 2009), pages 151-161.
    11. Aghion, Philippe & Akcigit, Ufuk & Howitt, Peter, 2014. "What Do We Learn From Schumpeterian Growth Theory?," Handbook of Economic Growth, in: Philippe Aghion & Steven Durlauf (ed.), Handbook of Economic Growth, edition 1, volume 2, chapter 0, pages 515-563, Elsevier.
    12. James Gwartney, 2012. "What Should We Be Teaching in Basic Economics Courses?," The Journal of Economic Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(3), pages 300-307, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. John T. Dalton & Lillian R. Gaeto, 2022. "Schumpeter vs. Keynes redux: “Still not dead”," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 89(2), pages 569-592, October.
    2. Dalton, John & Logan, Andrew, 2019. "A Vision for a Dynamic World: Reading Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy for Today," MPRA Paper 95012, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. John T. Dalton & Andrew J. Logan, 2020. "Using the movie Joy to teach innovation and entrepreneurship," The Journal of Economic Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 51(3-4), pages 287-296, August.
    4. Dalton, John T. & Logan, Andrew J., 2022. "The Man Who Discovered Capitalism: A documentary on Schumpeter for use in the classroom," International Review of Economics Education, Elsevier, vol. 41(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dalton, John T. & Logan, Andrew J., 2022. "The Man Who Discovered Capitalism: A documentary on Schumpeter for use in the classroom," International Review of Economics Education, Elsevier, vol. 41(C).
    2. John T. Dalton & Andrew J. Logan, 2020. "Using the movie Joy to teach innovation and entrepreneurship," The Journal of Economic Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 51(3-4), pages 287-296, August.
    3. John T. Dalton & Lillian R. Gaeto, 2022. "Schumpeter vs. Keynes redux: “Still not dead”," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 89(2), pages 569-592, October.
    4. Dalton, John & Logan, Andrew, 2019. "A Vision for a Dynamic World: Reading Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy for Today," MPRA Paper 95012, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    5. John T. Dalton & Andrew J. Logan, 2021. "Schumpeter in Vienna: A Study Abroad Course," Contributions to Economics, in: Joshua Hall & Kim Holder (ed.), Off-Campus Study, Study Abroad, and Study Away in Economics, chapter 0, pages 175-190, Springer.
    6. Nicholas Bloom & Charles I. Jones & John Van Reenen & Michael Webb, 2020. "Are Ideas Getting Harder to Find?," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 110(4), pages 1104-1144, April.
    7. Ugur, Mehmet & Trushin, Eshref, 2018. "Asymmetric information and heterogeneous effects of R&D subsidies: evidence on R&D investment and employment of R&D personel," Greenwich Papers in Political Economy 21943, University of Greenwich, Greenwich Political Economy Research Centre.
    8. Carlino, Gerald & Kerr, William R., 2015. "Agglomeration and Innovation," Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, in: Gilles Duranton & J. V. Henderson & William C. Strange (ed.), Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, edition 1, volume 5, chapter 0, pages 349-404, Elsevier.
    9. Roberto Bonfatti & Luis A. Bryce Campodonico & Luigi Pisano, 2018. "Reconciling the Original Schumpeterian Model with the Observed Inverted-U Relationship between Competition and Innovation," CESifo Working Paper Series 6948, CESifo.
    10. François Jeanjean, 2021. "Impact of Technical Progress on the Relationship Between Competition and Investment," Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 81-101, March.
    11. Kemnitz, Alexander & Knoblach, Michael, 2020. "Endogenous sigma-augmenting technological change: An R&D-based approach," CEPIE Working Papers 02/20, Technische Universität Dresden, Center of Public and International Economics (CEPIE).
    12. Philippe Aghion & Ufuk Akcigit & Angus Deaton & Alexandra Roulet, 2016. "Creative Destruction and Subjective Well-Being," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 106(12), pages 3869-3897, December.
    13. Sina T. Ates & Felipe E. Saffie, 2021. "Fewer but Better: Sudden Stops, Firm Entry, and Financial Selection," American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 13(3), pages 304-356, July.
    14. Schnellenbach, Jan, 2021. "The concept of Ordnungspolitik: Rule-based economic policy-making from the perspective of the Freiburg School," Freiburg Discussion Papers on Constitutional Economics 21/7, Walter Eucken Institut e.V..
    15. Gilles Saint-Paul, 2021. "Secular satiation," Journal of Economic Growth, Springer, vol. 26(3), pages 291-327, September.
    16. Philippe Aghion & Antonin Bergeaud & Timo Boppart & Peter J. Klenow & Huiyu Li, 2019. "Missing Growth from Creative Destruction," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 109(8), pages 2795-2822, August.
    17. Philippe Aghion & Ufuk Akcigit & Ari Hyytinen & Otto Toivanen, 2023. "2022 Klein Lecture Parental Education And Invention: The Finnish Enigma," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 64(2), pages 453-490, May.
    18. Pinchetti, Marco, 2020. "What Is Driving The TFP Slowdown? Insights From a Schumpeterian DSGE Model," MPRA Paper 98316, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    19. Aubhik Khan & Julia Thomas & Tatsuro Senga, 2018. "The Persistent Effects of Entry and Exit," 2018 Meeting Papers 707, Society for Economic Dynamics.
    20. Dan Johansson & Arvid Malm, 2017. "Economics Doctoral Programs Still Elide Entrepreneurship," Econ Journal Watch, Econ Journal Watch, vol. 14(2), pages 196–217-1, May.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Joseph Schumpeter; Innovation; Entrepreneurship; Creative Destruction; Education;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • A2 - General Economics and Teaching - - Economic Education and Teaching of Economics
    • O3 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights
    • P0 - Political Economy and Comparative Economic Systems - - General

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:93263. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joachim Winter (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/vfmunde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.