IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/pra/mprapa/18567.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Analyzing the Classic Methods of Organizing the Administration Accountacy Used in the Carboniferous Mining Industry

Author

Listed:
  • Paliu-Popa, Lucia
  • Dina, Ionela Claudia

Abstract

Information regarding production costs occupy a central slot, determined by their implications regarding the present and future evolution of a company. The value of information regarding the cost of production justifies its use both in decisions regarding the current activity and in the company’s future strategy. The efficient organization of economic activity in the carboniferous mining industry imposes a constant improvement of management methods, which also implies a reconsideration of administration accountancy methods and cost control, which have to become capable of offering information that can be compatible to the requirements for an efficient management of the production process, in a market economy.

Suggested Citation

  • Paliu-Popa, Lucia & Dina, Ionela Claudia, 2009. "Analyzing the Classic Methods of Organizing the Administration Accountacy Used in the Carboniferous Mining Industry," MPRA Paper 18567, University Library of Munich, Germany.
  • Handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:18567
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/18567/1/MPRA_paper_18567.pdf
    File Function: original version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Corici Marian Catalin & Mihalcea Mihaela Maria & Patruta Mircea Ioan, 2017. "Determination Of Economic Performance In The Romanian Energy Mining Industry Based On The Production Cost," Annals - Economy Series, Constantin Brancusi University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 3, pages 181-188, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Classic Methods; Administration Accountacy; Carboniferous Mining Industry;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M41 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - Accounting
    • H83 - Public Economics - - Miscellaneous Issues - - - Public Administration

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:18567. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joachim Winter (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/vfmunde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.