Public and Private Firms Competition in a Vertical Differentiation Setting – The Case of Healthcare Industry
AbstractWith the recent wave of privatisation and liberalisation the number of state owned firms has remarkably decreased. In some industries, namely in healthcare and education, and in many countries, they go on playing an important role, alone or competing with private ones. In this paper we use a model of vertical differentiation to study the effects of the presence of public firms on the quality of healthcare and on welfare. We conclude that, when the market is covered, there must be at least one public firm so that equilibrium welfare may be positive. When the market is not covered, we show that a public monopoly is socially better than a private one, but the only possible competition is between private firms.
Download InfoTo our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.
Bibliographic InfoPaper provided by Universidade do Porto, Faculdade de Economia do Porto in its series CEF.UP Working Papers with number 0507.
Length: 22 pages
Date of creation: Dec 2005
Date of revision:
public firms; competition; health;
Find related papers by JEL classification:
- I2 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education
- L13 - Industrial Organization - - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance - - - Oligopoly and Other Imperfect Markets
You can help add them by filling out this form.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Ana Bonanca).
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.