IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/phd/dpaper/dp_2001-05.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Metro Manila and Metro Cebu Groundwater Assessment

Author

Listed:
  • David, Cristina C.
  • Inocencio, Arlene B.
  • Clemente, Roberto S.
  • Abracosa, Ramon P.
  • Tabios, Guillermo Q.

Abstract

This paper describes the methodologies adopted and the results obtained in assessing the groundwater resources of Metro Manila and Metro Cebu. Also some early and recent studies on the aquifer systems in the two metropolis are presented to draw some comparisons on the assessment and data acquisition methods and identify some gaps involved and the improvements needed. Some of the indicators used in assessing groundwater potential and associated problems include storage coefficient, transmissivity, safe yield, and salt water intrusion. The complex and expensive nature of actual field monitoring and analysis has encouraged the use of mathematical models in this study. Specifically, models adopted by NHRC and JICA were used and their respective capabilities, data requirements and modeling results for water balance are described. Although the two models have specific inputs unique to each model and the NHRC model used secondary 9 year data (i.e. 1982-1990) while JICA used one-year actual data (1990), the models gave similar results as far as recharge to groundwater and piezometric heads are concerned. It was found that Metro Manila gets an annual recharge of 206 MCM which is basically due to the high rainfall events during the wet season. Inflows from Laguna lake and leakage from MWSS distribution systems have been also identified as contributors to the recharge. It was also found that due to the over pumping of wells in some coastal areas in Metro Manila, sea water intrusion of aquifers is now becoming a serious problem. The same holds true in Metro Cebu where water for all types of uses comes from groundwater. That is why the annual recharge from rainfall to the aquifer of the Maghaway valley in Cebu amounting to be 1.4 MCM plus an additional inflow of 1.1 MCM coming from riverbeds, are believed to be insufficient to cover the increasing demand for water from all sectors of the society. It is envisioned that a regional scale groundwater and environmental planning scheme for the two metropolis needs to be developed by linking the models with GIS so groundwater data base maps can be overlaid with land use, management practices, recharge distribution and mass loadings of chemicals. A follow-up study which will incorporate this methodology will provide a useful management tool for developing water resources on a regional scale.

Suggested Citation

  • David, Cristina C. & Inocencio, Arlene B. & Clemente, Roberto S. & Abracosa, Ramon P. & Tabios, Guillermo Q., 2001. "Metro Manila and Metro Cebu Groundwater Assessment," Discussion Papers DP 2001-05, Philippine Institute for Development Studies.
  • Handle: RePEc:phd:dpaper:dp_2001-05
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.pids.gov.ph/publication/discussion-papers/metro-manila-and-metro-cebu-groundwater-assessment
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Clemente, R. S. & Jong, R. De & Hayhoe, H. N. & Reynolds, W. D. & Hares, M., 1994. "Testing and comparison of three unsaturated soil water flow models," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 25(2), pages 135-152, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Clemente, R. S. & Prasher, S. O. & Salehi, F., 1998. "Performance testing and validation of PESTFADE," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 37(3), pages 205-224, September.
    2. Elmaloglou, St. & Malamos, N., 2000. "Simulation of soil moisture content of a prairie field with SWAP93," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 43(2), pages 139-149, March.
    3. Utset, Angel & Farre, Imma & Martinez-Cob, Antonio & Cavero, Jose, 2004. "Comparing Penman-Monteith and Priestley-Taylor approaches as reference-evapotranspiration inputs for modeling maize water-use under Mediterranean conditions," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 66(3), pages 205-219, May.
    4. Sharma, K. D. & Joshi, N. L. & Singh, H. P. & Bohra, D. N. & Kalla, A. K. & Joshi, P. K., 1999. "Study on the performance of contour vegetative barriers in an arid region using numerical models," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 41(1), pages 41-56, June.
    5. Maraux, F. & Lafolie, F. & Bruckler, L., 1998. "Comparison between mechanistic and functional models for estimating soil water balance: deterministic and stochastic approaches," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 1-20, October.
    6. Bastiaanssen, W.G.M. & Allen, R.G. & Droogers, P. & D'Urso, G. & Steduto, P., 2007. "Twenty-five years modeling irrigated and drained soils: State of the art," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 92(3), pages 111-125, September.
    7. Bhattacharya, B. K. & Sastry, P. S. N., 1999. "Comparative evaluation of three-crop growth models for the simulation of soil water balance in oilseed Brassica," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 42(1), pages 29-46, September.
    8. Kumar, R. & Jat, M.K. & Shankar, V., 2013. "Evaluation of modeling of water ecohydrologic dynamics in soil–root system," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 269(C), pages 51-60.
    9. Singh, Rajinder & Singh, Joginder, 1997. "Irrigation planning in wheat (Triticum aestivum) under deep water table conditions through simulation modelling," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 33(1), pages 19-29, May.
    10. Shafiei, Mojtaba & Ghahraman, Bijan & Saghafian, Bahram & Davary, Kamran & Pande, Saket & Vazifedoust, Majid, 2014. "Uncertainty assessment of the agro-hydrological SWAP model application at field scale: A case study in a dry region," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 324-334.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:phd:dpaper:dp_2001-05. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Aniceto Orbeta (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/pidgvph.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.