IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/socarx/rs7d8.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Inteligencia Artificial: Gobernanza y Legitimidad

Author

Listed:
  • Gil, Olga

Abstract

This paper has recieved ICDS 2023 Award: It has been selected among "Best Papers" based on the reviews of the original submission, the camera-ready version, and the presentation during the conference [as seen in https://www.iaria.org/conferences2023/AwardsICDS23.html] The paper received an invitation to submit an extended article version to one of the IARIA Journals, and it has been published with date December 2023 with the tittle "AI Philosophy: Sources of Legitimacy to Analyze Artificial Intelligence". NOW, here is the traslation to Spanish: Ante los desafíos para la humanidad de los desarrollos disruptivos de la inteligencia artificial, este trabajo plantea discusiones desde diferentes perspectivas. Dichas perspectivas permiten plantear discusiones con científicos de diferentes campos, gobiernos, empresas y otros actores sociales sobre cuestiones relacionadas con la inteligencia artificial, la gobernabilidad y la legitimidad. El objetivo principal y el resultado del artículo es presentar un panel de control para el análisis de la gobernabilidad y la legitimidad de la inteligencia artificial, al que se denomina Gil Dashboard o Panel Gil. Este panel de control trata de resolver disputas de teoría política partiendo de enfoques clásicos para estudiar la gobernabilidad y la legitimidad. El panel de control también permite comparaciones en la gobernabilidad y la legitimidad de la IA en regímenes democráticos y no democráticos, en diferentes niveles de gobierno –tanto en los países Occidentales como en el Sur Global. Un resultado adicional es la aplicación del Panel al caso de China como estudio de caso. La aplicación del Panel de control permite 1) mostrar su valor como herramienta metodológica y analítica, y 2) arrojar una nueva mirada interpretativa y sugerente a los datos existentes en el caso chino. Inteligencia artificial; gobernanza; filosofía; ética; teoría política; China.

Suggested Citation

  • Gil, Olga, 2024. "Inteligencia Artificial: Gobernanza y Legitimidad," SocArXiv rs7d8, Center for Open Science.
    • Handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:rs7d8
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/rs7d8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/65df66e86d0cb812331a99f5/
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/rs7d8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sung-Young Kim, 2019. "Hybridized industrial ecosystems and the makings of a new developmental infrastructure in East Asia’s green energy sector," Review of International Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(1), pages 158-182, January.
    2. World Bank, 2021. "Harnessing Artificial Intelligence for Development on the Post-COVID-19 Era," World Bank Publications - Reports 35619, The World Bank Group.
    3. Ronit Justo-Hanani, 2022. "The politics of Artificial Intelligence regulation and governance reform in the European Union," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 55(1), pages 137-159, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Woszczyna Karolina & Mania Karolina, 2023. "The European map of artificial intelligence development policies: a comparative analysis," International Journal of Contemporary Management, Sciendo, vol. 59(3), pages 78-87, September.
    2. Krzywdzinski, Martin & Gerst, Detlef & Butollo, Florian, 2022. "Promoting human-centred AI in the workplace. Trade unions and their strategies for regulating the use of AI in Germany," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, issue OnlineFir, pages 1-1.
    3. Rajiv Kumar, 2023. "Taking the developmental state seriously: Why South Korea outperformed neoliberal regulatory states in rapid coronavirus disease 2019 vaccinations and saving lives," International Area Studies Review, Center for International Area Studies, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, vol. 26(4), pages 319-340, December.
    4. Warneryd, Martin & Håkansson, Maria & Karltorp, Kersti, 2020. "Unpacking the complexity of community microgrids: A review of institutions’ roles for development of microgrids," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 121(C).
    5. Nicole Lemke & Philipp Trein & Frédéric Varone, 2023. "Agenda-setting in nascent policy subsystems: issue and instrument priorities across venues," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 56(4), pages 633-655, December.
    6. Martin Krzywdzinski & Detlef Gerst & Florian Butollo, 2023. "Promoting human-centred AI in the workplace. Trade unions and their strategies for regulating the use of AI in Germany," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 29(1), pages 53-70, February.
    7. Ayodele Asekomeh & Obindah Gershon & Smith I. Azubuike, 2021. "Optimally Clocking the Low Carbon Energy Mile to Achieve the Sustainable Development Goals: Evidence from Dundee’s Electric Vehicle Strategy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-23, February.
    8. Gil, Olga, 2023. "AI Philosophy: Sources of Legitimacy to Analyze Artificial Intelligence," OSF Preprints 39njx, Center for Open Science.
    9. Mariusz Tomczyk & Henryk Wojtaszek & Małgorzata Chackiewicz & Małgorzata Orłowska, 2023. "Electromobility and Renewable Energy Sources: Comparison of Attitudes and Infrastructure in Poland and Germany," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-34, December.
    10. John Mathews & Elizabeth Thurbon & Sung-Young Kim & Hao Tan, 2023. "Gone with the wind: how state power and industrial policy in the offshore wind power sector are blowing away the obstacles to East Asia’s green energy transition," Review of Evolutionary Political Economy, Springer, vol. 4(1), pages 27-48, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:rs7d8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://arabixiv.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.