IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/socarx/b75fr.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Manual versus machine: An evaluation of the performance of the Medical Text Indexer (MTI) at classifying different document types by disease area

Author

Listed:
  • Moore, Duncan A.Q.
  • Yaqub, Ohid
  • Sampat, Bhaven N.

Abstract

The Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) thesaurus, a controlled vocabulary, is increasingly being used by those who study research and innovation. While classification was once purely entirely manual, human indexers are now assisted by algorithmic suggestions in an effort to automate some of the indexing process. A version of this algorithm, the Medical Text Indexer, has been made available, allowing for classification of arbitrary text into MeSH categories. Potentially, this opens up other document classes to MeSH assignment for research and innovation studies. However, it remains unclear how well the MTI, a tool designed to categorize publications for indexing purposes, can be reliably extended to other document classes. To allow for assessment of the MTI’s performance for different classes of documents, we collected text from grant descriptions, patent claims, and drug indications; and compared the MTI’s categorisation to that of a qualified human classifier. We also tested whether MTI performance varied with text length or score thresholding. Our results suggest that researchers can proceed with confidence that the MTI reliably captures the diseases contained in a text (recall), and that its scoring can be used to guard against false diseases in its outputs (precision).

Suggested Citation

  • Moore, Duncan A.Q. & Yaqub, Ohid & Sampat, Bhaven N., 2023. "Manual versus machine: An evaluation of the performance of the Medical Text Indexer (MTI) at classifying different document types by disease area," SocArXiv b75fr, Center for Open Science.
  • Handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:b75fr
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/b75fr
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/63f8bbcbbbc5e5027ff804a9/
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/b75fr?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dennis Byrski & Fabian Gaessler & Matthew J. Higgins, 2021. "Market Size and Research: Evidence from the Pharmaceutical Industry," NBER Working Papers 28858, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yaqub, Ohid & Coburn, Josie & Moore, Duncan A.Q., 2023. "Knowledge spillovers from HIV research-funding," SocArXiv gcuhn, Center for Open Science.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Becker, Annette & Hottenrott, Hanna & Mukherjee, Anwesha, 2022. "Division of labor in R&D? Firm size and specialization in corporate research," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 194(C), pages 1-23.
    2. Aggarwal, Mayank & Chakrabarti, Anindya S. & Chatterjee, Chirantan & Higgins, Matthew J., 2023. "Research and market structure: Evidence from an antibiotic-resistant pathogenic outbreak," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(1).
    3. Li, Xuelin & Liu, Tong & Taylor, Lucian A., 2023. "Common ownership and innovation efficiency," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 147(3), pages 475-497.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:b75fr. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://arabixiv.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.