IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/osfxxx/pg94b.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Emerging Technologies, Corporate Social Responsibility and Sustainability: The Perception of Business Students in Ghana

Author

Listed:
  • Duho, King Carl Tornam
  • Onumah, Joseph Mensah
  • Simpson, Samuel Nana Yaw
  • Onumah, Regina Mensah

Abstract

The present fourth industrial revolution is characterized by concerns for technological advancement. Studies in literature have examined the factors that affect the perception of business students towards either corporate social responsibility or sustainability or both. Yet, there has not been any study that examines how students’ embracing, knowledge and ability to make business cases out of these emerging technologies affect either corporate social responsibility or sustainability. The current study filled this gap by using a survey dataset of 150 business students of the University of Ghana Business School. The study employed the partial least squares structural equation modelling to examine the relationships. Generally, the students have a relatively higher concern for corporate social responsibility and sustainability. As regards the knowledge of emerging technologies, responses are just a little above average. The top four technologies with high student knowledge are the internet of things, mobility technology, digital service delivery and cybersecurity while the bottom four are blockchain, quantum computing, big data analytics, and robotics. The study found that students that embrace emerging technologies eventually take steps to increase their knowledge in these technologies but the knowledge may not necessarily enhance the concern for corporate social responsibility and sustainability. It is when students embrace the new technologies and eventually make business cases and envisage implications from them that they get concerned about issues of corporate social responsibility and sustainability. We propose for more case study based teaching about issues in emerging technologies tied to corporate ethics — corporate social responsibility and sustainability. The study offered relevant insights for policy, practice and academia.

Suggested Citation

  • Duho, King Carl Tornam & Onumah, Joseph Mensah & Simpson, Samuel Nana Yaw & Onumah, Regina Mensah, 2019. "Emerging Technologies, Corporate Social Responsibility and Sustainability: The Perception of Business Students in Ghana," OSF Preprints pg94b, Center for Open Science.
  • Handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:pg94b
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/pg94b
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/5d654241e4727b00182c0d0f/
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/pg94b?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Anna-Maija Lämsä & Meri Vehkaperä & Tuomas Puttonen & Hanna-Leena Pesonen, 2008. "Effect of Business Education on Women and Men Students’ Attitudes on Corporate Responsibility in Society," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 82(1), pages 45-58, September.
    2. Larrán, Manuel & Andrades, Javier & Herrera, Jesús, 2018. "An examination of attitudes and perceptions of Spanish business and accounting students toward corporate social responsibility and sustainability themes," Revista de Contabilidad - Spanish Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 21(2), pages 196-205.
    3. World Commission on Environment and Development,, 1987. "Our Common Future," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780192820808.
    4. Lee Cronbach, 1951. "Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 16(3), pages 297-334, September.
    5. Leontitsis, Alexandros & Pagge, Jenny, 2007. "A simulation approach on Cronbach's alpha statistical significance," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 73(5), pages 336-340.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shannon Rogers & Semra Aytur & Kevin Gardner & Cynthia Carlson, 2012. "Measuring community sustainability: exploring the intersection of the built environment & social capital with a participatory case study," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 2(2), pages 143-153, June.
    2. Francesco Rosati & Lourenço Galvão Diniz Faria, 2019. "Business contribution to the Sustainable Development Agenda: Organizational factors related to early adoption of SDG reporting," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(3), pages 588-597, May.
    3. Clea Beatriz Macagnan & Rosane Maria Seibert, 2021. "Sustainability Indicators: Information Asymmetry Mitigators between Cooperative Organizations and Their Primary Stakeholders," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-16, July.
    4. Constantin Aurelian Ionescu & Liliana Paschia & Nicoleta Luminita Gudanescu Nicolau & Sorina Geanina Stanescu & Veronica Maria Neacsu Stancescu & Mihaela Denisa Coman & Marilena Carmen Uzlau, 2020. "Sustainability Analysis of the E-Learning Education System during Pandemic Period—COVID-19 in Romania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-22, October.
    5. Rosario Adapon Turvey & Nandakumar Kanavillil & Christopher Murray & Gerardo Reyes, 2018. "Creating sustainable communities: skills and learning in Ontario’s small urban municipalities," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 20(3), pages 1173-1190, June.
    6. Anna-Maija Lämsä & Suvi Heikkinen & Raminta PuÄ Ä—taitÄ—, 2023. "Social Sustainability, Leadership and Human Resource Management," South Asian Journal of Business and Management Cases, , vol. 12(1), pages 7-13, April.
    7. Mollie Painter-Morland & Ehsan Sabet & Petra Molthan-Hill & Helen Goworek & Sander Leeuw, 2016. "Beyond the Curriculum: Integrating Sustainability into Business Schools," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 139(4), pages 737-754, December.
    8. Szymon Zaleski & Rafał Michalski, 2021. "Success Factors in Sustainable Management of IT Service Projects: Exploratory Factor Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-28, April.
    9. Larrán, Manuel & Andrades, Javier & Herrera, Jesús, 2018. "An examination of attitudes and perceptions of Spanish business and accounting students toward corporate social responsibility and sustainability themes," Revista de Contabilidad - Spanish Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 21(2), pages 196-205.
    10. Otilia Vanessa Cordero-Ahiman & Jorge Leonardo Vanegas & Pablo Beltrán-Romero & María Elena Quinde-Lituma, 2020. "Determinants of Food Insecurity in Rural Households: The Case of the Paute River Basin of Azuay Province, Ecuador," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-18, January.
    11. RiHyun Shin & Jin-Woo Park & DongRyeol Choi, 2024. "Disruptive Passenger Behavior Impact on Overall Service Experience: An Appraisal Theory Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-18, March.
    12. Francisca Castilla-Polo & María Consuelo Ruiz-Rodríguez & Alonso Moreno & Ana Licerán-Gutiérrez & Macario Cámara de la Fuente & Eva Chamorro Rufián & Manuel Cano-Rodríguez, 2020. "Classroom Learning and the Perception of Social Responsibility Amongst Graduate Students of Management Accounting," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-22, August.
    13. Boglárka Németh & Károly Németh & Jon N. Procter, 2021. "Informed Geoheritage Conservation: Determinant Analysis Based on Bibliometric and Sustainability Indicators Using Ordination Techniques," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-31, May.
    14. Chanwit Kongklaew & Khamphe Phoungthong & Chanwit Prabpayak & Md. Shahariar Chowdhury & Imran Khan & Nuttaya Yuangyai & Chumpol Yuangyai & Kuaanan Techato, 2021. "Barriers to Electric Vehicle Adoption in Thailand," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-13, November.
    15. Turkan Muge Ozbekler & Yucel Ozturkoglu, 2020. "Analysing the importance of sustainability‐oriented service quality in competition environment," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(3), pages 1504-1516, March.
    16. Esperanza Vera-Toscano & Fernando Garrido-Fernández & José Gómez-Limón & José Cañadas-Reche, 2013. "Are Theories About Social Capital Empirically Supported? Evidence from the Farming Sector," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 114(3), pages 1331-1359, December.
    17. Sukhoon Chung & Jin-Woo Park & Sangryeong Lee, 2022. "The Influence of CSR on Airline Loyalty through the Mediations of Passenger Satisfaction, Airline Brand, and Airline Trust: Korean Market Focused," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-15, April.
    18. Habib Alipour & Farzad Safaeimanesh & Arezoo Soosan, 2019. "Investigating Sustainable Practices in Hotel Industry-from Employees’ Perspective: Evidence from a Mediterranean Island," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-30, November.
    19. Ahmed Ghaithan & Mohammed Khan & Awsan Mohammed & Laith Hadidi, 2021. "Impact of Industry 4.0 and Lean Manufacturing on the Sustainability Performance of Plastic and Petrochemical Organizations in Saudi Arabia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-20, October.
    20. Leyla Angélica Sandoval Hamón & Ana Paula Martinho & M. Rosário Ramos & Cecilia Elizabeth Bayas Aldaz, 2020. "Do Spanish Students Become More Sustainable after the Implementation of Sustainable Practices by Universities?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-21, September.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:pg94b. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://osf.io/preprints/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.