IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/eartha/6xq3w.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Statistics and segmentation: Using Big Data to assess Cascades Arc compositional variability

Author

Listed:
  • Pitcher, Bradley W

    (Vanderbilt University)

  • Kent, Adam J.R.

Abstract

Primitive lavas erupted in the Cascades arc of western North America demonstrate significant patterns of along-arc heterogeneity. Such compositional diversity may be the result of differences in mantle melting processes, subduction geometry, regional tectonics, or compositions of the slab, mantle or overlying lithosphere. Previous authors have partitioned the arc into four geochemically distinct segments in order to assess the importance and relative roles of these potential causes (Schmidt et al., 2008). However, despite the immense amount of data available from the Cascade arc, no previous study has utilized a statistical approach on a comprehensive dataset to address such a fundamental petrologic question. To better characterize the heterogeneity of the entire arc, we compiled >250,000 isotopic, major, and trace element analyses (glass and whole rock) from nearly 13,000 samples. To minimize inherent sampling bias – the effect where well-studied volcanoes heavily weight conclusions – we use a weighted bootstrap Monte Carlo approach in which the probability of a sample being selected to the posterior distribution was inversely proportional to the number of samples within its 0.25° latitude bin. This methodology produces a more uniform and unbiased distribution from which we can assess regional, rather than local, compositional variability in the Cascades arc. Using a multivariate statistical approach, we demonstrate that the four segments designated by Schmidt et al. (2008) are, in fact, statistically distinct. However, using a modified hierarchical clustering mechanism, we objectively divide the arc into six regions which have geochemical differences that are up to 6.3 times more statistically significant than in the previous scheme. Our new, more robust segmentation scheme includes the Garibaldi (49.75-51°N), Baker (48.5-49.75°N), Glacier Peak (47.75-48.5°N), Washington (45.75-47.75°N), Graben (44.25-45.75°N), and South (41.25-44.25°N) Segments. By partitioning the arc into the most statistically distinct segments and calculating unbiased mean compositions for each, we explore the petrogenetic causes for the regional-scale differences in primitive lava compositions. These bootstrapped mean data indicate significant inter-segment differences in fluid-flux signature, mantle fertility, and depth and degree of melting. We suggest that differences in subduction geometry, regional tectonics and mantle heterogeneity are the primary causes for these intra-arc differences. This study demonstrates the value of rigorous statistics and the use of big data in the field of petrology.

Suggested Citation

  • Pitcher, Bradley W & Kent, Adam J.R., 2018. "Statistics and segmentation: Using Big Data to assess Cascades Arc compositional variability," Earth Arxiv 6xq3w, Center for Open Science.
  • Handle: RePEc:osf:eartha:6xq3w
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/6xq3w
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/5ba95c039108ce0017f60929/
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/6xq3w?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. C. Brenhin Keller & Blair Schoene, 2012. "Statistical geochemistry reveals disruption in secular lithospheric evolution about 2.5 Gyr ago," Nature, Nature, vol. 485(7399), pages 490-493, May.
    2. Ronit Kessel & Max W. Schmidt & Peter Ulmer & Thomas Pettke, 2005. "Trace element signature of subduction-zone fluids, melts and supercritical liquids at 120–180 km depth," Nature, Nature, vol. 437(7059), pages 724-727, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Guoxiong Chen & Qiuming Cheng & Timothy W. Lyons & Jun Shen & Frits Agterberg & Ning Huang & Molei Zhao, 2022. "Reconstructing Earth’s atmospheric oxygenation history using machine learning," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-13, December.
    2. Bo Huang & Man Liu & Timothy M. Kusky & Tim E. Johnson & Simon A. Wilde & Dong Fu & Hao Deng & Qunye Qian, 2023. "Changes in orogenic style and surface environment recorded in Paleoproterozoic foreland successions," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-14, December.
    3. Hong-Yan Li & Xiang Li & Jeffrey G. Ryan & Chao Zhang & Yi-Gang Xu, 2022. "Boron isotopes in boninites document rapid changes in slab inputs during subduction initiation," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-10, December.
    4. Di-Cheng Zhu & Qing Wang & Roberto F. Weinberg & Peter A. Cawood & Sun-Lin Chung & Yong-Fei Zheng & Zhidan Zhao & Zeng-Qian Hou & Xuan-Xue Mo, 2022. "Interplay between oceanic subduction and continental collision in building continental crust," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-10, December.
    5. Hong-Yan Li & Rui-Peng Zhao & Jie Li & Yoshihiko Tamura & Christopher Spencer & Robert J. Stern & Jeffrey G. Ryan & Yi-Gang Xu, 2021. "Molybdenum isotopes unmask slab dehydration and melting beneath the Mariana arc," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-10, December.
    6. Yunchao Shu & Sune G. Nielsen & Veronique Roux & Gerhard Wörner & Jerzy Blusztajn & Maureen Auro, 2022. "Sources of dehydration fluids underneath the Kamchatka arc," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-14, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:eartha:6xq3w. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://eartharxiv.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.