IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/africa/yv9e2.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The joint AU-EU Innovation Agenda: when Science, Technology and Innovation (STI) stand for Sustainable Tangible Impact

Author

Listed:
  • Lorusso, Vincenzo
  • Venturi, Piero
  • Seke, Lukovi
  • Teshome, Mahlet
  • Idinoba, Monica Ebele
  • Masheleni, Hambani
  • Buisman, Nienke
  • Hoegel, Jens

Abstract

Outcome of the African Union (AU) – European Union (EU) Research & Innovation (R&I) Ministerial Meeting of July 2020, the “AU-EU Innovation Agenda” aims to turn R&I investments into tangible businesses, services and jobs. This Agenda proposes specific objectives with short-, medium- and long-term actions for all four priority areas of the AU-EU cooperation in Science, Technology and Innovation (STI), namely (i) Public Health, (ii) Green Transition, (iii) Innovation and Technology and (iv) Capacities for Science. This paper aims to raise awareness on the AU-EU Innovation Agenda and the ongoing public consultation on its working document (open until 30 June 2022). This consultation will gather feedback and input from citizens, stakeholders and their respective organisations, through an online survey (https://ec.europa.eu/eusurvey/runner/IAPublicConsultation). This is done to ensure that the Agenda will address actual unmet needs on the ground, to ultimately maximise chances to provide for sustainable and inclusive growth in Africa and Europe.

Suggested Citation

  • Lorusso, Vincenzo & Venturi, Piero & Seke, Lukovi & Teshome, Mahlet & Idinoba, Monica Ebele & Masheleni, Hambani & Buisman, Nienke & Hoegel, Jens, 2022. "The joint AU-EU Innovation Agenda: when Science, Technology and Innovation (STI) stand for Sustainable Tangible Impact," AfricArxiv yv9e2, Center for Open Science.
  • Handle: RePEc:osf:africa:yv9e2
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/yv9e2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/62bcbb43934394004fa0b90f/
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/yv9e2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mokyr, Joel, 2018. "The past and the future of innovation: Some lessons from economic history," Explorations in Economic History, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 13-26.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Venturini, Francesco, 2022. "Intelligent technologies and productivity spillovers: Evidence from the Fourth Industrial Revolution," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 194(C), pages 220-243.
    2. Alexander Cuntz & Carsten Fink & Hansueli Stamm, 2024. "Artificial Intelligence and Intellectual Property : An Economic Perspective," WIPO Economic Research Working Papers 77, World Intellectual Property Organization - Economics and Statistics Division.
    3. Aina Gallego & Thomas Kurer & Nikolas Schöll, 2018. "Not so disruptive after all: How workplace digitalization affects political preferences," Economics Working Papers 1623, Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra.
    4. Yulia Gruzina & Irina Firsova & Wadim Strielkowski, 2021. "Dynamics of Human Capital Development in Economic Development Cycles," Economies, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-18, May.
    5. Nataliia Toropchenko & Olena Trokhymets, 2021. "Trends In Investment Activity And Accumulation Of Investment Disproportions In The Economy Of Ukraine," Green, Blue & Digital Economy Journal, Publishing house "Baltija Publishing", vol. 2(1).
    6. Leonardo A. Rocha & Maria Ester S. Dal Poz & Patrícia V.P.S. Lima & Ahmad S. Khan & Napiê G. A. Silva, 2019. "Corruption, bureaucracy and other institutional failures: the “cancer†of innovation and development," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 39(3), pages 1740-1754.
    7. Naudé, Wim, 2020. "From the Entrepreneurial to the Ossified Economy: Evidence, Explanations and a New Perspective," GLO Discussion Paper Series 539, Global Labor Organization (GLO).
    8. Yamashita, Nobuaki, 2021. "Economic crisis and innovation capacity of Japan: Evidence from cross-country patent citations," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    9. Giovanna Ciaffi & Matteo Deleidi & Stefano Di Bucchianico, 2022. "Stagnation despite ongoing innovation: Is R&D expenditure composition a missing link? An empirical analysis for the US (1948-2019)," Department of Economics University of Siena 877, Department of Economics, University of Siena.
    10. Nataliia Toropchenko & Olena Trokhymets, 2021. "Trends In Investment Activity And Accumulation Of Investment Disproportions In The Economy Of Ukraine," Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, Publishing house "Baltija Publishing", vol. 2(1).
    11. Wim Naudé, 2022. "From the entrepreneurial to the ossified economy," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 46(1), pages 105-131.
    12. Lovlyn Ekeowa Kelvin-Iloafu & Francis Ezieshi Monyei & Wilfred Isioma Ukpere & Happiness Ozioma Obi-Anike & Phina Njideka Onyekwelu, 2023. "The Impact of Human Capital Development on the Sustainability and Innovativeness of Deposit Money Banks’ Workforces," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-15, July.
    13. Eric J. Bartelsman, 2019. "From New Technology to Productivity," European Economy - Discussion Papers 113, Directorate General Economic and Financial Affairs (DG ECFIN), European Commission.
    14. James C. A. Redman, 2020. "An Overview of Innovation in the Arab Gulf States: From Origins and Five‐Year Plans to New Cities and Indices," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 101(7), pages 2485-2506, December.
    15. Gries, Thomas & Naude, Wim, 2018. "Artificial intelligence, jobs, inequality and productivity: Does aggregate demand matter?," MERIT Working Papers 2018-047, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    16. Gordon, Robert J., 2018. "Declining American economic growth despite ongoing innovation," Explorations in Economic History, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 1-12.
    17. Taalbi, Josef, 2019. "Innovation waves and technological transitions: Sweden, 1909-2016," Lund Papers in Economic History 196, Lund University, Department of Economic History.
    18. Tânia Pinto & Aurora A. C. Teixeira, 2020. "The impact of research output on economic growth by fields of science: a dynamic panel data analysis, 1980–2016," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 123(2), pages 945-978, May.
    19. Michael J. Andrews & Aaron K. Chatterji & Scott Stern, 2021. "Introduction: Beyond 140 Characters," NBER Chapters, in: The Role of Innovation and Entrepreneurship in Economic Growth, pages 1-28, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    20. Aina Gallego & Thomas Kurer & Nikolas Schöll, 2018. "Neither Left-Behind nor Superstar: Ordinary Winners of Digitalization at the Ballot Box," Working Papers 1063, Barcelona School of Economics.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:africa:yv9e2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://osf.io/preprints/africarxiv/discover .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.