IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/oec/itfaab/2017-23-en.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Synergies from Improved Cycling-Transit Integration: Towards an Integrated Urban Mobility System

Author

Listed:
  • Roland Kager

    (Studio Bereikbaar)

  • Lucas Harms

    (University of Amsterdam)

Abstract

Improved integration of cycling and transit has the potential to overcome the fundamental limitations of each mode by combining their opposite strengths of flexibility and action radius. The benefits of such integration potentially extend beyond user benefits and the trip level. We present seven conceptual mechanisms that lead to synergies, understood as benefits not attributable to cycling or transit in isolation, but to their integration only. As an illustration, we analyse and allocate such synergies by a case study of the Dutch cycling-transit system. Where the practical absence of cycling has limited such potential in many locations elsewhere, the recent resurgence in cycling practice and culture, especially in urban agglomerations, enables new opportunities for improved cycling-transit integration. Urban agglomerations are also the locations where land-use and mobility related issues seem particularly pressing and where we claim cycling-transit synergies are strongest. The article concludes with a discussion of implication and application.

Suggested Citation

  • Roland Kager & Lucas Harms, 2017. "Synergies from Improved Cycling-Transit Integration: Towards an Integrated Urban Mobility System," International Transport Forum Discussion Papers 2017/23, OECD Publishing.
    • Handle: RePEc:oec:itfaab:2017/23-en
    DOI: 10.1787/ce404b2e-en
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1787/ce404b2e-en
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1787/ce404b2e-en?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Daniel Danau & Annalisa Vinella, 2021. "Under/Over‐Investment and Early Renegotiation in Public‐Private Partnerships," Journal of Industrial Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 69(4), pages 923-966, December.
    2. Greg Rybarczyk & Richard R. Shaker, 2021. "Predicting Bicycle-on-Board Transit Choice in a University Environment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-16, January.
    3. Hossein Dashtestaninejad & Paul van de Coevering & Joost de Kruijf, 2023. "Car Use: A Matter of Dependency or Choice? The Case of Commuting in Noord-Brabant," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(3), pages 56-68.
    4. Olaf Jonkeren & Roland Kager & Lucas Harms & Marco Brömmelstroet, 2021. "The bicycle-train travellers in the Netherlands: personal profiles and travel choices," Transportation, Springer, vol. 48(1), pages 455-476, February.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oec:itfaab:2017/23-en. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/itoecfr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.