IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/oec/envaab/2011-2-en.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Frequent and Flexible: Options for Reporting Guidelines for Biennial Update Reports

Author

Listed:
  • Jane Ellis

    (OECD)

  • Gregory Briner

    (OECD)

  • Sara Moarif

    (International Energy Agency)

  • Barbara Buchner

    (Climate Policy Initiative)

Abstract

The Cancun Agreements outlined the list of topics to be included in biennial reports and indicated that guidelines for them were to be developed, but provided limited guidance on their structure and content. This paper proposes a structure for biennial reports for both developed and developing countries under the UNFCCC, and outlines possible reporting formats by which countries could submit this information. The paper suggests that: (i) a similar structure is developed for biennial reports from both developed and developing countries; this would ensure consistency of information presented within different countries’ reports, and would also facilitate international assessment and review (IAR) and international consultations and analysis (ICA); (ii) three main sections are included for biennial reports from all Parties: GHG inventory information; progress on mitigation and mitigation actions; and financial, technology and capacity building support; in addition, a section on emissions projections would be mandatory for developed countries and optional for developing countries; (iii) biennial reports focus on key information where possible, with fuller descriptions and background information reported either in annexes (in the case of national inventory reports from developing countries) or less frequently via other reporting mechanisms under the UNFCCC (such as national communications). This paper also proposes that flexibility be maintained in the reporting guidelines for biennial reports. This could be achieved through the use of “reporting levels” which reflect the different national circumstances and levels of reporting experience between Parties (particularly within the group of developing country Parties). Parties could choose the most appropriate level for each section of their report according to their goal type or reporting capacity, and “move up” levels as and when they can (as is currently the case for GHG inventory calculations). A limited number of levels are suggested for developed countries, as in many cases reporting to the highest level is already mandatory for these countries. For developing countries there could be greater flexibility and a higher number of reporting levels, reflecting the broad range of national circumstances and reporting capacities within this group. The introduction of reporting levels into guidelines would allow countries to provide information at a level that is consistent with their current capabilities, and to improve their reporting over time. Les accords de Cancun ont défini la liste des points qui devront être traités dans les rapports biennaux, et indiqué que des directives seraient élaborées à cet effet, mais peu d’indications ont été données quant à la structure et au contenu de ces rapports. Le présent document propose une structure qui pourrait être utilisées par les pays développés et par les pays en développement dans le cadre de la CCNUCC, ainsi que des modèles de présentation qui pourront les aider à rendre compte de ces informations. Il est suggéré : (i) d’élaborer une seule et même structure pour les rapports biennaux des pays développés et en développement ; cela permettrait d’harmoniser les informations contenues dans les rapports des différents pays et faciliterait en outre les processus d’évaluation et d’examen internationaux et les consultations et analyses internationales ; (ii) d’inclure trois grandes sections dans les rapports biennaux de toutes les Parties : informations sur les inventaires de GES ; progrès réalisés en matière d’atténuation et activités d’atténuation ; et appui dans les domaines du financement, de la technologie et du renforcement des capacités ; d’inclure en outre une section sur les projections des émissions qui serait obligatoire pour les pays développés et facultative pour les pays en développement ; (iii) de privilégier dans les rapports biennaux, dans la mesure du possible, les informations essentielles et de présenter des descriptions plus complètes et des informations générales soit en annexe (dans le cas des rapports nationaux d’inventaire des pays en développement) soit moins fréquemment, par le biais d’autres mécanismes de notification de la CCNUCC (communications nationales, par exemple). Le présent document propose en outre de maintenir une certaine flexibilité dans les directives relatives à la présentation des rapports biennaux. Pour ce faire, des « niveaux de notification » correspondant aux différentes situations nationales et degrés d’expérience en matière de notification des Parties (en particulier à l’intérieur du groupe des pays en développement parties) pourraient être utilisés. Les Parties pourraient choisir le niveau le plus approprié pour chaque section du rapport, en fonction du type d’objectif visé ou de leur capacité de notification, et « passer au niveau supérieur » le moment venu (ce qui se fait déjà pour les calculs des inventaires de GES). Le nombre de niveaux serait restreint pour les pays développés, étant donné que ces pays ont déjà dans bien des cas l’obligation de se conformer au plus haut niveau de notification. Une plus grande flexibilité et des niveaux de notification plus nombreux pourraient être prévus pour les pays en développement, pour rendre compte de la diversité des situations nationales et des capacités de notification à l’intérieur de ce groupe. L’introduction de niveaux de notification dans les directives devrait permettre aux pays de fournir des informations à un niveau adapté à leurs capacités du moment, qu’ils pourront améliorer ultérieurement.

Suggested Citation

  • Jane Ellis & Gregory Briner & Sara Moarif & Barbara Buchner, 2011. "Frequent and Flexible: Options for Reporting Guidelines for Biennial Update Reports," OECD/IEA Climate Change Expert Group Papers 2011/2, OECD Publishing.
  • Handle: RePEc:oec:envaab:2011/2-en
    DOI: 10.1787/5k45165j1kmq-en
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1787/5k45165j1kmq-en
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1787/5k45165j1kmq-en?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Li, Jun & Wang, Xin, 2012. "Energy and climate policy in China's twelfth five-year plan: A paradigm shift," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 519-528.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    changement climatique; climate change; gaz à effet de serre; greenhouse gas; measurement; mesure; notification; et vérification; reporting and verification;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • F53 - International Economics - - International Relations, National Security, and International Political Economy - - - International Agreements and Observance; International Organizations
    • Q54 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Climate; Natural Disasters and their Management; Global Warming
    • Q56 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Environment and Development; Environment and Trade; Sustainability; Environmental Accounts and Accounting; Environmental Equity; Population Growth
    • Q58 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Environmental Economics: Government Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oec:envaab:2011/2-en. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/enoecfr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.