IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/oec/eduaaf/19-en.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

What Are Tertiary Students Choosing to Study?

Author

Listed:
  • OECD

Abstract

The social sciences are the most popular field for non-vocational tertiary education programmes. One in three new students choose a programme in social sciences, business and law. Gender equality has been virtually achieved in many fields of study, especially in social sciences and services but significant gender differences persist in computing and engineering (maledominated) and in health and welfare and education (female-dominated). Almost one in four international students in OECD countries follow programmes in the field of business and administration (23%). The proportion of international students from fields oriented to the public function such as education (3%) or health and welfare (9%) is lower on average.

Suggested Citation

  • Oecd, 2014. "What Are Tertiary Students Choosing to Study?," Education Indicators in Focus 19, OECD Publishing.
    • Handle: RePEc:oec:eduaaf:19-en
    DOI: 10.1787/5jz8ssmzg5q4-en
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1787/5jz8ssmzg5q4-en
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1787/5jz8ssmzg5q4-en?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Vivian Carstensen & Roland Happ & Olga Zlatkin-Troitschanskaia, 2020. "Second-Generation Immigrants’ Entry into Higher Education: Students’ Enrollment Choices at Different Types of Universities," Eastern Economic Journal, Palgrave Macmillan;Eastern Economic Association, vol. 46(1), pages 126-160, January.
    2. Wiederspan, Mark, 2016. "Denying loan access: The student-level consequences when community colleges opt out of the Stafford loan program," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 79-96.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oec:eduaaf:19-en. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/deoecfr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.