IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/oec/eduaab/164-en.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Birthplace diversity, income inequality and education gradients in generalised trust: The relevance of cognitive skills in 29 countries

Author

Listed:
  • Francesca Borgonovi

    (OECD)

  • Artur Pokropek

    (European Commission, Joint Research Centre)

Abstract

The paper examines between-country differences in the mechanisms through which education could promote generalised trust using data from 29 countries participating in the OECD’s Survey of Adult Skills (PIAAC). Results indicate that education is strongly associated with generalised trust and that a large part of this association is mediated by individuals’ literacy skills, income and occupational prestige. However, education gradients in levels of generalised trust and in the extent to which they are due to social stratification mechanisms or cognitive skills mechanisms vary across countries. Differences across countries in birthplace diversity and income inequality are correlated with how strongly education is associated with trust in different countries, as well as in the relative magnitude of direct and indirect associations. In particular, the relationship between literacy skills and generalised trust is stronger in the presence of greater birthplace diversity but is weaker in the presence of greater income inequality.

Suggested Citation

  • Francesca Borgonovi & Artur Pokropek, 2017. "Birthplace diversity, income inequality and education gradients in generalised trust: The relevance of cognitive skills in 29 countries," OECD Education Working Papers 164, OECD Publishing.
  • Handle: RePEc:oec:eduaab:164-en
    DOI: 10.1787/f16a8bae-en
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1787/f16a8bae-en
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1787/f16a8bae-en?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oec:eduaab:164-en. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/deoecfr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.