IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/oec/eduaab/146-en.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Education, Labour Market Experience and Cognitive Skills: A First Approximation to the PIAAC Results

Author

Listed:
  • Juan Francisco Jimeno

    (Banco de España)

  • Aitor Lacuesta

    (Banco de España)

  • Marta Martínez-Matute

    (Banco de España)

  • Ernesto Villanueva

    (Banco de España)

Abstract

This paper examines how formal education and experience in the labour market correlate with measures of human capital available in The Survey of Adult Skills, a product of the OECD Programme for the International Assessment of Adult Competencies (PIAAC). The findings are consistent with the notion that, in producing human capital, work experience substitutes formal education at the bottom of the schooling distribution. First, the number of years of working experience correlates with literacy proficiency only among low-educated individuals. Secondly, low-educated workers who only perform simple tasks on their jobs (calculating percentages or reading emails) do better in numeracy and literacy tests than similar employees who did not perform those tasks. Thirdly, workers in jobs intensive in numeric tasks perform relatively better in the numeracy section of the PIAAC test than in the literacy part. Overall, our results suggest that the contribution of on-the-job learning to skill formation is about a third of that of compulsory schooling in most of the countries that participated in PIAAC. Ce document étudie les liens entre, d’une part, la scolarité et l’expérience professionnelle, et d’autre part, les indicateurs du capital humain présents dans l’Évaluation des compétences des adultes, lancée dans le cadre du Programme de l’OCDE pour l'évaluation internationale des compétences des adultes (PIAAC). Les résultats concordent avec l’idée selon laquelle, dans le contexte de la production de capital humain, l’expérience professionnelle se substitue à la scolarité à l’extrémité inférieure de la distribution des niveaux d’instruction. Premièrement, le nombre d’années d’expérience professionnelle n’est corrélé au niveau de compétences à l’écrit que chez les individus peu qualifiés. Deuxièmement, les actifs peu qualifiés qui n’effectuent que des tâches simples (calculer des pourcentages ou lire des courriers électroniques) obtiennent de meilleurs résultats aux tests de compétences en calcul et à l’écrit que des salariés similaires qui n’effectuent pas ce type de tâches. Troisièmement, les salariés qui effectuent des nombreuses tâches de calcul obtiennent des résultats relativement meilleurs en calcul qu’à l’écrit au test du PIAAC. Dans l’ensemble, nos résultats semblent indiquer que la contribution de l’expérience professionnelle aux compétences acquises représente un tiers environ de celle de la scolarité obligatoire dans la plupart des pays ayant participé au PIAAC.

Suggested Citation

  • Juan Francisco Jimeno & Aitor Lacuesta & Marta Martínez-Matute & Ernesto Villanueva, 2016. "Education, Labour Market Experience and Cognitive Skills: A First Approximation to the PIAAC Results," OECD Education Working Papers 146, OECD Publishing.
  • Handle: RePEc:oec:eduaab:146-en
    DOI: 10.1787/5jlphd2qj19n-en
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1787/5jlphd2qj19n-en
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1787/5jlphd2qj19n-en?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oec:eduaab:146-en. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/deoecfr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.