IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/oec/eduaab/111-en.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Implementation of a New School Supervision System in Poland

Author

Listed:
  • Grzegorz Mazurkiewicz

    (Jagiellonian University)

  • Bartłomiej Walczak

    (Jagiellonian University)

  • Marcin Jewdokimow

    (Jagiellonian University)

Abstract

This case study explores the strategies, processes and outcomes of an education reform in Poland which was introduced in 2009 and substantively changed the school inspection system. Its analysis looks in particular at the co-operation between the central and the local level throughout the implementation of the programme. In order to address the shortcomings of the prior inspection system, the reform combined internal and external evaluation in school supervision practice and put greater emphasis on collaboration among stakeholders. The results of the analysis show that the reform has had a great impact on the organisation of inspectorates, introducing modern principles such as teamwork and self-evaluation. Also, it affected the attitudes of important actors in the education system regarding the relevance of data to support internal and external school evaluation. The overall goals and aims of the reform gained the support of the various stakeholders. However, the implementation and communication processes were seen as deficient, especially in terms of a lack of capacity to roll out the reform as well as a lack of trust/disbelief that evaluation can be used for improvement, rather than the expected punitive purposes. Nevertheless, the reform achieved first structural steps towards building a culture of self-evaluation, which had thus far not been part of the Polish education system. L’étude de cas présentée ici examine l’amélioration des performances du système scolaire polonais au moyen d’un nouveau mécanisme d’évaluation introduit en 2009. Ce dernier s’appuie sur des structures conçues pour se substituer au dispositif d’inspection existant, ce qui rend la mise en oeuvre de la réforme difficile à plusieurs égards : aspects logistiques et structurels, changements d’allégeance et problèmes d’orgueil professionnel, ainsi que luttes de pouvoir entre les niveaux central/régional/local. Tandis que la majorité des enseignants et des directeurs touchés par la réforme soutenaient les objectifs généraux du programme, des doutes s’élevaient quant à la procédure de mise en oeuvre elle-même. Dans de telles configurations, un échange structuré entre les acteurs clefs faciliterait l’alignement des stratégies de mise en oeuvre avec les objectifs globaux de la réforme. La critique principale fustigeait un manque de capacités (moyens financiers ou connaissances) au niveau local pour la mise en oeuvre de la réforme, et un certain scepticisme quant à la possibilité d’utiliser l’évaluation pour susciter des améliorations sans recourir aux sanctions habituellement prévues. Néanmoins, la réforme a effectué les premières démarches vers le développement d'une culture de l'auto-évaluation, jusqu'à présent absente du système éducatif polonais.

Suggested Citation

  • Grzegorz Mazurkiewicz & Bartłomiej Walczak & Marcin Jewdokimow, 2014. "Implementation of a New School Supervision System in Poland," OECD Education Working Papers 111, OECD Publishing.
  • Handle: RePEc:oec:eduaab:111-en
    DOI: 10.1787/5jxrlxrxgc6b-en
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1787/5jxrlxrxgc6b-en
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1787/5jxrlxrxgc6b-en?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oec:eduaab:111-en. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/deoecfr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.