IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/oec/dafaaa/2016-2-en.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Investment Policies Related to National Security: A Survey of Country Practices

Author

Listed:
  • Frédéric Wehrlé

    (OECD)

  • Joachim Pohl

    (OECD)

Abstract

While many countries have become ever more open and welcoming for foreign investment, the awareness of risks for national security stemming from or related to international investment has increased. Many governments have thus introduced policies that seek to protect their national security with the smallest possible impact on investment flows. Guidelines for recipient country investment policies relating to national security adopted at the OECD in 2009 provide recommendations for the design and implementation of such policies. This paper reviews commonalities and differences of policies implemented in 54 countries with a special focus on arrangements in 17 economies that have explicit policies in this area. It offers a comparative analysis of countries’ investment policy approaches to address national security concerns stemming from foreign investment; classifies the different forms of restrictions to address these concerns; identifies differences between restrictions on ownership and acquisitions; and presents how countries define the scope of application of their policies. The study also assesses how countries have implemented some of the key principles set out in the 2009 Guidelines in actual policy in order to meet their need to safeguard national security while reducing the impact of these policies on international investment.

Suggested Citation

  • Frédéric Wehrlé & Joachim Pohl, 2016. "Investment Policies Related to National Security: A Survey of Country Practices," OECD Working Papers on International Investment 2016/2, OECD Publishing.
    • Handle: RePEc:oec:dafaaa:2016/2-en
    DOI: 10.1787/5jlwrrf038nx-en
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1787/5jlwrrf038nx-en
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1787/5jlwrrf038nx-en?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. K. Buysse & D. Essers, 2019. "Cheating tiger, tech-savvy dragon : Are Western concerns about “unfair trade” and “Made in China 2025” justified ?," Economic Review, National Bank of Belgium, issue ii, pages 47-70, September.
    2. Keyan Lai, 2021. "National security and FDI policy ambiguity: A commentary," Journal of International Business Policy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 4(4), pages 496-505, December.
    3. Fernando Mistura & Caroline Roulet, 2019. "The determinants of Foreign Direct Investment: Do statutory restrictions matter?," OECD Working Papers on International Investment 2019/01, OECD Publishing.
    4. Alvaro Cuervo-Cazurra, 2018. "Thanks but no thanks: State-owned multinationals from emerging markets and host-country policies," Journal of International Business Policy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 1(3), pages 128-156, December.
    5. Anastasia Ufimtseva, 2020. "The Rise of Foreign Direct Investment Regulation in Investment‐recipient Countries," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 11(2), pages 222-232, April.
    6. Rajavuori, Mikko & Huhta, Kaisa, 2020. "Investment screening: Implications for the energy sector and energy security," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    7. Marco Albori & Flavia Corneli & Valerio Nispi Landi & Alessandro Schiavone, 2021. "The impact of restrictions on FDI," Questioni di Economia e Finanza (Occasional Papers) 656, Bank of Italy, Economic Research and International Relations Area.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    CFIUS; international investment; national security;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • F52 - International Economics - - International Relations, National Security, and International Political Economy - - - National Security; Economic Nationalism
    • F53 - International Economics - - International Relations, National Security, and International Political Economy - - - International Agreements and Observance; International Organizations

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oec:dafaaa:2016/2-en. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/caoecfr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.