IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/nsr/niesrd/215.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

A Firm Choice: Law Firms' Preferences in the Recruitment of Trainee Solicitors

Author

Listed:
  • Dr Heather Rolfe

Abstract

In the UK, of all the professions, law has some of the most demanding entry requirements and is one in which family connections and Oxbridge credentials ease the path to entry. At the same time, the popularity of undergraduate law courses at UK universities has rocketed in recent years and universities have responded by expanding courses. The result has been an increase in law graduates in the UK, particularly from new, post 1992, universities and in the number of young people pursuing a career in law. Partly because of the tradition of elitism within the profession, the growing popularity of law, as an academic subject and career choice, raises issues of access and equality of opportunity for prospective entrants. These issues have been addressed in previous research on a cohort of students (see Shiner 1997 and 1999), which found different rates of success in gaining a contract according to applicants' background and characteristics, including race and ethnicity, and evidence of bias in the allocation of the more prestigious training contracts in city and large provincial firms.

Suggested Citation

  • Dr Heather Rolfe, 2003. "A Firm Choice: Law Firms' Preferences in the Recruitment of Trainee Solicitors," National Institute of Economic and Social Research (NIESR) Discussion Papers 215, National Institute of Economic and Social Research.
  • Handle: RePEc:nsr:niesrd:215
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nsr:niesrd:215. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Library & Information Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/niesruk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.